Talk:George Preca
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
George Preca is part of the WikiProject Saints, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Saints and other individuals commemorated in Christian liturgical calendars on Wikipedia. This includes but is not limited to saints as well as those not so affiliated, country and region-specific topics, and anything else related to saints. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. | ||
| Low | This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. |
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] | ||
 |
George Preca is within the scope of WikiProject Malta, a collaborative effort to write and enhance articles related to Malta. You can participate by visiting the Project page, getting involved, and helping to get the project started. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the assessment scale. | |
| High | This article has been rated as high-importance on the importance scale. | |
http://www.sdcmuseum.org/ (the site of the organisation of which George preca was the founder.)
Contents |
[edit] Attention tag
This is obviously a cut and paste job from a very POV source, and needs edited ASAP. -- Pastordavid 10:49, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Rewrite
I'm willing to perform a complete rewrite of this article, as time allows. (And I do think a near-complete rewrite will be necessary.) Alekjds talk 04:00, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
- I'm completely rewriting this article at User:Alekjds/Preca. I don't expect it will take me longer than a day to do it. Alekjds talk 22:43, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Twin article
This article has a twin, apparently. Check out the incorrectly named "Preca" article. It appears to have been excessively plagiarized, and from the same source as this article. It should be deleted. Alekjds talk 23:10, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Replaced
I just replaced this article with my own rewritten version, as I had committed myself to do late last month. Hopefully this will do the trick. It's not as long, but that's probably desirable considering that anything is better than the plagiarized mess that was the last revision. Even so, any comments or concerns are more than welcome, they would be very much appreciated, in fact. Alekjds talk 06:04, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
