Talk:George Nozuka
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This page was previously nominated for deletion.
Please see prior discussions before considering re-nomination:
|
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| Stub | This article has been rated as stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] | ||
 |
This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed biographical guide to musicians and musical groups on Wikipedia. | ||
[edit] Sources
The AfD and deletion review mentioned sources, but I'm not seeing any sources here. Someone please add sources that indicate this article satisfies WP:MUSIC - or it's likely to be re-listed for deletion. Rklawton 03:50, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- WP:MUSIC doesn't require that the article have certain sources. That's simply not what it says. While some links would be useful, it's not a criterion. If it gets relisted, then the AFD and DRV will just get dug back up. The AFD and DRV are linked from the talk page, so unless someone is too reckless about AFD to do due diligence, it won't get relisted. - Keith D. Tyler ¶ (AMA) 04:05, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- The DRV seemed to revolve around the reliability of the article's sources. Rklawton 04:38, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- No, the DRV ultimately revolved around the lack of consensus in the AFD debate. Do you have something against this artist? You've managed to misrepresent what's written in WP:MUSIC as well as in the AFD and DRV discussions. For some reason, one person suggested that the websites of legitimate Canadian news organizations were not WP:RS. I think Canadians would find that a pretty far-fetched notion. - Keith D. Tyler ¶ (AMA) 20:27, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- In the world of musicians, surely not all can be notable. A musician with a single album produced by a label with only one record and only one promotional tour really looks like a musician who is just starting out on his career – and not one sufficiently notable for inclusion in an encyclopedia. Rklawton 20:41, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- You need to take that argument to Wikipedia_talk:Notability (music). - Keith D. Tyler ¶ (AMA) 05:48, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
- In the world of musicians, surely not all can be notable. A musician with a single album produced by a label with only one record and only one promotional tour really looks like a musician who is just starting out on his career – and not one sufficiently notable for inclusion in an encyclopedia. Rklawton 20:41, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- No, the DRV ultimately revolved around the lack of consensus in the AFD debate. Do you have something against this artist? You've managed to misrepresent what's written in WP:MUSIC as well as in the AFD and DRV discussions. For some reason, one person suggested that the websites of legitimate Canadian news organizations were not WP:RS. I think Canadians would find that a pretty far-fetched notion. - Keith D. Tyler ¶ (AMA) 20:27, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- The DRV seemed to revolve around the reliability of the article's sources. Rklawton 04:38, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- Can somebody actually look into the "Kevin Bacon is his uncle" thing? It doesn't seem very credible. (March 13, 2007)
- I think that Kevin Bacon really is his Uncle, whats wrong with that? Thats not something to lie about, I mean who would lie about something like that when that seems very immature and a stupid thing to do.
- There's a reference for it; nobody's lying!Dr-ring-ding 01:50, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:GeorgeNozuka.jpg
Image:GeorgeNozuka.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 11:19, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
