Talk:George Cockcroft

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Religion Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.
	This article falls within the scope of the Interfaith work group. If you are interested in Interfaith-related topics, please visit the project page to see how you can help. If you have any comments regarding the appropriateness or positioning of this template, please let us know at our talk page.

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]

I do have the legal wherewithal to post this. There is a similar article on h2g2, which I also wrote. No copyright breach here. -Martin

Surely his email address shouldn't be in here. - David Gerard 00:38, Jan 23, 2004 (UTC)

Any particular reason why not? I did ask him for permission, and he said he wasn't bothered. Martin 00:51, 23 Jan 2004 (UTC)

Ah, OK then :-) - David Gerard 01:05, Jan 23, 2004 (UTC)

I deleted his email address - its not encyclopaedic, and there's no particular reason why it should be there. MNo other author has his email address on their page!Mofs (talk) 21:18, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

I don't know what definition of encyclopedic you're using that excludes email addresses, but I can think of a few reasons to keep it there (as if the fact that you can't ends the discussion) -- I was looking for it. I've reverted your change, pending a discussion here. Llamabr (talk) 03:34, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Potential reliability

I might delete this section. It looks like it belongs in the talk page, not on the article page. Llamabr 04:02, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

done Llamabr 03:24, 12 August 2007 (UTC)