Talk:George Bogle (Detroit preacher)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] | ||
Why not just improve the article/ if you think it is POV then go for it- edit it, this tagging is dumb, and speaks to a kind of over-officious-jerkiness--216.249.8.25 00:23, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The Pastor mentioned his son found this article on the Internet and briefly read on a broadcast Nov 4th 2005. That's how I found it. I made a few grammatical, and logical corrections, such as in the location, and categories. The pastor seemed surprised he had an entry on him- and thought it was a 'unique' take on his work. Hugh Judson--137.207.120.145 16:56, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
[edit] User:Heqs claim to advertising Tags
The purpose of tagging is to help the article conform to higher standards. So, try to let any future editor why a tag is added. I cannot really tell what the complaint is from just reading the edit summary. An 'unencyclopedic' image is why? Thus I added a new one of my own GNU just to be certain that it is copyright free. Obviously the image fits the article, and is encyclopedic- The article is about a preacher from Detroit (the city in the picture) and his radio show is called Nightvision (thus the night view of the city.) I made a few changes as per my guess at what struck the user as "advertising", but if you read any article of a radio show, say the Phil Hendrie Show or whatever, they might all be interpreted as advertsing. Since the show is only available in Detroit, what market effect does this article really have anyway? Whether a reader believes it or not, and I have lived in downtown Windsor, slash Metro Detroit off and on for eight years, this preacher does have a commuity presence, unrelated to his show or ministry and the City of Detroit did commerate his work, which is unrelated to the broadcasting of his current show. --Mikerussell 19:07, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] References
This article really need more referneces. --RucasHost 12:55, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Houseofprayer.jpg
Image:Houseofprayer.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 23:05, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
