Talk:Geology of Alderley Edge

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the assessment scale. (Add assessment comments)
Low This article has been rated as low-importance within the UK geography WikiProject.
Geology of Alderley Edge is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.
B This article has been rated as B-class on the quality scale.
Mid This article has been rated as mid-importance on the importance scale.
This article is supported by the Cheshire WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Cheshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the Project Page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the assessment scale.
Low This article has been rated as Low-Priority on the priority scale.

Section headings de-capitalised, most of the section on red beds moved to stub on same topic, link introduced in Geology of the UK and Geology of Cheshire. Any help/ideas on further tidy up appreciated Geotek 01:35, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

This article seems to have a good coverage, and has potential to be a Good Article. GB 10:53, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Tone - this is supposed to be easy to understand

As John McEnroe might have said "good article candidate, you cannot be serious!" Wikipedia is supposed to be a encylopaedia understandable by the man on the street not a magazine for geology enthusiasts. What on earth do terms like "Syn-depositional" and "Basal Permian breccias" mean? - they're not even wikilinked to give an explanation and the following sentence would be totally incomprehensible to anyone but a geology enthusiast

Upward fining facies successions within the Members are characterised by planar laminated, ripple-bedded and cross-bedded sandstones with abundant intraformational rip-up clasts, exotic clasts and water escape structures

Come on guys, something we can all understand please! Richerman (talk) 00:40, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Point taken, as soon as I get time I will run through it and try to wiki link as much as possible. One of the problems is many of the terms are less than stubs which doesn't help much.Geotek (talk) 23:49, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
I suppose any terms that can't be wikilinked would need to be explained in the article - I know you can do it ;-) Incidentally, as you clearly know what you're talking about when it come to geology, could you have a look at the Geology section in the River Irwell article? I've written a short section from general stuff I found in non-specialist books but some of that I had to rewrite because even I could see it was wrong. I was trying to find a reference for a description of Manchester Marl when I came across this article. Richerman (talk) 10:06, 28 April 2008 (UTC)