Talk:Geoffrey I of Villehardouin
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| WikiProject Biography (Rated Stub-Class) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| Stub | This article has been rated as stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] | ||
 |
This article is supported by the Royalty and nobility work group. | ||
|
|
|||
 |
An appropriate infobox may need to be added to this article, or the current infobox may need to be updated. Please refer to the list of biography infoboxes for further information. | ||
 |
Geoffrey I of Villehardouin is within the scope of WikiProject France, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project and help with our open tasks. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses. | |
 |
Geoffrey I of Villehardouin is part of WikiProject Middle Ages, a project for the community of Wikipedians who are interested in the Middle Ages. For more information, see the project page and the newest articles. | ||
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale. | ||
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. | ||
|
Article Grading: |
|||
 |
Crusades task force | ||
|
WikiProject Middle Ages To do:
|
|||
Why "Geoffrey Villehardouin" and not "Geoffrey of Villehardouin" or "Geoffrey de Villehardouin"? Srnec 22:52, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
No reason. Either of your two options seem better to me. Go ahead. --FocalPoint 16:27, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Text from the Chronicle of the Crusade
I think that section should be either reformatted, integrated into the article perhaps by paraphrasing, or deleted. It doesn't really seem to fit with the rest of the article, IMO. - Iotha 23:50, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
Reformatting might be a good idea, however, please note that the one and only scope of this paragraph is to give information collected from a primary source. If we paraphrase it, then we are giving our version of the story (just like all other historians are doing). It is not intended to fit with the rest of the article and this is why it comes after "See also", since it is really text supporting the article. If you or someone else wants to do something about it, please take this under consideration.--FocalPoint 07:34, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
