User talk:General Tiger

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] welcome

Hi, General Tiger, it seems that you are a new user in Wikipedia. I hope you have a good time editing and/or creating articles. Remember to read all the guidelines, policies, rules, etc. I hope we can work together on Korea related articles.

If you would like to join Portal:Korea, feel free to do so. Also Wikipedia:WikiProject Korea (WP:KO) is open for membership where you can start improving articles. Good friend100 03:21, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Discussion

Perhaps you're angry at me, but I'm certainly not angry at you, or at any other person, nor do I hate you. If you wish to discuss some issues, we can. I left a table of sources on the Gando page, due to the article length, but I'm confident of being able to footnote any fact on that page. The internet is indeed full of nationalist and POV sources, which is why I took the time to research and reference them, instead of using my own opinions.

I'm not anti-Korean, but I do oppose things that are blatently POV and factually inaccurate. If you take a look at the page history, you'll see that the original Gando page was incredibly biased, used maps nowhere near accurate, got a bunch of facts wrong, and was clearly pushing a POV. It used sources from such sites as [1], so I did research on the issue to flesh out a more detailed and factual article. I'm human and I might not get edits right 100% of the time, but I do try harder to research and reference things on controversial issues, and I do try to fix things that are blatently POV and non-factual. One of the editors who I reverted on Gando also edited on other pages using this as his source. (That page claims that ancient Sumerians, Amerindians, and ancient Chinese civilization originated from Korea)

Perhaps you may feel the internet is completely dominated by Han nationalist POV sites, but I hope after seeing this you realize that the internet isn't immune to Korean nationalist views either, and why we shouldn't continue to perpetuate either on Wikipedia. Here's another example of one that claims Korea originated the Chinese, Indian, Mesopotamian, and Egyptian civilizations, and it apparently comes from [2].

If all it takes is a few online edits for you to hate me, then you probably had preconcieved notions long before you saw me and you probably need to evaluate your own views more closely. Has hate of Chinese in South Korea reached the level of anti-Japanese sentiment yet? I hope it's not the case. I don't care whether you are or aren't a nationalist of any country, as long as your edits are NPOV and factual. Wikipedia has been a helpful resource to me before, and I hate to see anyone distorting facts on it. I feel it will be a lot more useful to both nationalists and non-nationatists alike if it continues to stay at a high level of quality, accuracy, and neutrality. --Yuje 07:08, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

When you log on to MSN, keep an eye out for me!--Yuje 12:17, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Dokdo

See m:The Wrong Version. -- Steel 13:41, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

From WP:FULL: "admins should avoid favouring one version of the article over another". -- Steel 13:52, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Sockpuppet accusation

Personally, I think you should feel free to remove that template. It was placed by what appears to be a single-purpose account which made only that one edit. No case has been filed at Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets, nor anywhere else that I can see, and having seen a fair number of your edits I don't think the case is terribly strong. If you are concerned about this accusation, you might file a request for CheckUser to clear your name.

For more about Appleby, see user:Appleby. I was away from Wikipedia at the time, so I don't know the details of his case, but he has been blocked indefinitely for sockpuppeting. -- Visviva 03:39, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

I agree, if you feel you have done nothing wrong, remove the tag. There was also a user that accused user:KiteString of being a sockpuppet as well. Good friend100 02:02, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] ㅎㅇ

Nothing to it. Oyo321 05:01, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 반가요

한국사람찾기힘든네요. 시간나면 고구려 모던팔러틱스 편집좀해주세요. 힘드네요. 혹 nangnang nation에 대해 아는것 있으시면 편집부탁요. So, you are almost native english speaker. I have a difficulty to use wiki when I dispute something. I could see very few Korean in Wiki but I am happy to see you here. It is very hard to solve the problem of editing especially korean and chinese history. There are so many chinese and other nations' people may know only the historical facts written by China. We Korean might have concentrated on teaching our history to other countries. It is very sad to me. Anyway, if you have some knowledge about korean history, please support me.. --Hairwizard91 15:19, 27 October 2006 (UTC) <----요기 제 이름

[edit] 그렇군요

그런데 동북이란말은 중국애들만 쓰지 유럽애들도 안써요. 만주란 이름이 더 보편화 되어있고 만주란 이름을 없앨려고 중국애들이 무지 노력하고있죠. 만주라고 하면 만주국, 여진족, 고구려등이 떠올려지거든요. 같이 노력해봅시다. 충고 감사합니다. --Hairwizard91 02:02, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

시간되면 nangnang nation도 와주셔서 도와주세요. 한사군에 반박할 좋은 주제입니다. --Hairwizard91 02:03, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 그렇군요 두번째 ^^

제가 engineer다 보니깐 직접적으로 말하는게 습관이 되어서요 ^^
아 그리고요.. 저 혼자 계속 반박하는것 보단 님이랑 번갈아가면서 하는게 더 보기 좋을것같아요. 저의 user page에 쓴것을 님께서 직접 달아놓으시는것이 좋을것 같네요. ^^ 저만 계속하니깐 제 말은 안믿는 경향이 있어서요. 저 찍힌것 같습니다 하하--Hairwizard91 09:51, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

아 그리고 고구려는 하루아침에 끝날일이 아니것같습니다. 두고두고 talk page에다가 써야지... 당장 급한건 nangnang nation 같아요... 제가 마지막으로 쓴 talk page에 아무도 답을 달지 않네요 ^^ 우리나라 사학자들 다들 어용사학자라서리 ㅠ.ㅠ--Hairwizard91 09:57, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 싸이트 링크라면 이걸 말씀하시는지

저도 역사전문가가 아니라서 잘 모르겠네요 ㅠ.ㅠ 어떻게해야할지. 사학자들은 다 뭐하는지 몰라요. 싸이트링크라하면 이걸말씀하시는건가요?

백제 Baekje
낙랑국 Nangnang nation
고구려 Goguryeo
고조선강역 Gojoseon#Theories_of_Gojoseon.27s_Territory
그밖에 Gija기자, Gija Joseon기자조선, Wiman위만, Wiman Joseon위만조선
지금 막 만들었는데 조선사편수회라고 Joseonsa_Pyeonsuhoe
--Hairwizard91 10:10, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

아그리고 제가 자주 들리는 곳인데 [3] 가보세요 유용한 정보가 많아요.

[edit] Invitation

You are strongly invited to the working group of korea history Wikipedia:WikiProject_Korea/History

And also the working group for working group for Korean military history. Cheers, -- Visviva 04:06, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Baekdu

I've been planning on updating that page a while ago, but been too busy to get around to it. I took a look at your user page, and I'm really flattered that someone would take inspiration from me. I myself draw inspiration from the speeches of Vladimir Zhirinovsky, a guy running to be president of Russia. His idea of Russian foreign policy: "I dream of the day when Russian soldiers can wash their boots in the warm waters of the Indian Ocean". --Yuje 21:59, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] I need Information for editing guideline

There is a user called User:Opp2 in Talk:Dokdo. He seems to be bias, and many editors in Wikipedia notice the issue. He claims that he will "delete the description about Japanese contradiction and terra nullius for NPOV and clearing the fabrication if no one can confirm a Japanese government's original source." I don't think this is a good idea, and I am afraid that Dokdo article will be edited in a wrong biased way, especially without coordination between editors. So I told him several times that he is bias and he doesn't simply have enough witness to simply support his argument. He is being really tough to protect himself against criticism from a lot of opposing editors. He demands for wikipedia editing guideline. The quote by this user: "Do you say that the lie and POV have to leave at Wikipedia? Is that written in the guideline? Please teach where of the guideline to be being written."

I want your feed back right away and help us in Dokdo Talk Page. Thank you.--User:Kingj123 02:38, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] READ THIS!

I copied your red devil thingy. I liked it, so I put it on my user page. Thanks. If you disapprove of this, just tell me to take it off.Odst 00:55, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Hi

Hi General Tiger,

I know you've put a lot of work into your userboxes, so I hope you're not too offended that I removed what could be interpreted as a racial slur. I trust it was only meant in jest, but is very likely to be misinterpreted.

I also escaped the fair-use image; unfortunately those are not permitted in user space; see WP:USER#Images on user pages for more.

If there's anything wrong with my user page, you can fix that too. ;-) Cheers, -- Visviva 01:21, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Please have a look at Wikipedia:User page#What can I not have on my user page?: “[U]sing userpages to attack people or campaign for or against anything or anyone is a bad idea.” To avoid creating a hostile atmosphere, how about toning down your userboxes and not using Image:Manchuria.png in connection with your statement? Wikipedia is not the right place to threaten or intimidate fellow contributors. Wikipeditor 06:02, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Of course, if “currently fixing the user boxes” is to be understood as “removing polemical content”, forget what I wrote above. Wikipeditor 06:06, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Manchuria is Chinese place, itwas never part of Korea

No Greater Korean Fundamentalism! 203.218.79.215 11:10, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] 아! 그게 또 그렇게 되는건가요??

3년 뒤에나 들어와 보려다가 한번 들어와 봤는데 토론이 들어왔네요... 그 정도로는 욕까지는 좀 그렇죠... 좀 험한말 정도로 쳐야지 욕까지는 아닌거 같습니다. 아무튼 3년 동안은 안들어 오려고 합니다. 중국놈들의 역사왜곡에 대해 반박할 논리는 많은데 영어가 딸려서리... 그래서 영어를 완전히 배우고 다시 위키로 돌아 올겁니다... 아무튼 그 때 까진 제 유저페이지는 버려진 페이지 정도로 생각 하시면 됩니다. 정 보기 싫으시다면 제 유저페이지를 수정시키겠습니다. 그럼 이만... --Korea history (talk) 13:45, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] 예.

예, 님의 인사글을 잘 받았습니다. 감사합니다. 국제위키백과회협에 참여 하실 생각이 있습니까? 저의 목적은 모든 나라의 위키백과들을 하나로 통일하는것입니다. 참여를 하신다면 많은 감사드립니다. 감사합니다. 그런데 저를 어떻게 알으셨죠? 혹시 고구려 토론 페이지에서 보셨나요? 그리고 국제위키백과협회에 참여하시고 싶이시면, 이 페이지 AINW (English to/from Korean section)에 싸인을 해주세요. Orthodoxy 19:04, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Deletion of content from talk pages

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Talk:Gyopo. Please be more careful when editing articles and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. (diff [4]) cab 14:26, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Korean Nationalism

Hi, I found your page through Wikiprojects Korea, I have just begun editing wikipedia's page for 'Korean Nationalism' which has been written with a very anti-korean slant. I'm asking around for contributions repairing the overall negative tone and information(for a more NPOV), if you are interested in contributing please do! I made a few changes including a brief introduction and origins section, as well as a history section which will be filled in the upcoming days. Overall the entire article needs to be restructured, as it reads like random bits of information(related to korean nationalism or not) thrown on the page. Let me know.CatherineKim (talk) 05:18, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] your claim korea needs to recover lost territories...

about your claim korea needs to recover lost territories... i see the picture you placed on that template, and it claims manchuria is part of korea IMFAO. LOL, chinese commandaries stretched into the korean peninsula far beyond its modern borders, even before korea controlled ANY part of manchuria..... —Preceding unsigned comment added by RestoreTheEmpireSociety (talk • contribs) 23:56, 1 June 2008 (UTC)