From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
Genesis I has had a peer review by Wikipedia editors which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
This article is within the scope of the following WikiProjects: |
WikiProject Space (Rated B-Class) |
|
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Space. |
B |
This article has been rated as B-Class on the assessment scale. |
Related projects: |
|
WikiProject Spaceflight |
Importance to Spaceflight: Mid |
This article has been rated but has no comments. If appropriate, please review the article and leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.
|
Human spaceflight WikiProject (Rated B-Class) |
|
This article is within the scope of the Human spaceflight WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the manned exploration of space. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
|
|
[edit] Random
Genesis-I and Genesis-i should redirect to this article.
There is a bunch of more precise info in this article: http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2006/09/22/4632.aspx
Especially in the comments part. Corrected figures for volume, launch weight and proposed timetables.
[edit] Huge space
Why is there such a huge space above the article but below the page title? --myselfalso 00:33, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] No reason for "(module)"
Genesis I redirects here, this article should just be there. --Bp0 11:36, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, I've been meaning to clean up some of these redirects. "Genesis I" is likely better redirected to the Biblical "Genesis", which is where it *used* to point before someone made this article. I'll be fixing things before long. -- Huntster T • @ • C 03:07, 26 September 2007 (UTC)