Talk:Gene Geimer

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Gene Geimer article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

This article is within the scope of the following WikiProjects:

WikiProject Biography     (Rated Stub-Class) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. Biography Portal Stub This article has been rated as stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] This article is supported by the Sports and games work group. WikiProject Chicago Chicago Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles related to Chicago. ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale. ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. WikiProject on Football     (Rated Start-Class) Association football Portal The article on Gene Geimer is supported by the WikiProject on Football, which is an attempt to improve the quality and coverage of Association football related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page; if you have any questions about the project or the article ratings below, please consult the FAQ. Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. This article is supported by the USA and Canada task force.