User talk:Gcp
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
gcp(talk)
A Fruitloopian article - how would we go about it? Dammit where would we begin???? ThePeg 17:38, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanx for the warning re the Fruitloopian article. I'm on it. Keep the dream alive! ThePeg 23:03, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
Have made some adjustments which I hope make the term Fruitloopian more factually based. I am afraid we have a fight on our hands. As with all heresies the Fruitloopian term looks like it is being viewed with scepticism and hostility by the Powers That Be. Some people have no sense of humour. We must fight the po-faced guardians of posterity with every fibre of our being, even if our last stand is Fruitloopsegur. Let us pool our intellectual resources and defend the concept. :-) Gotta say, they move fast. How can we keep the article up and running? ThePeg 23:23, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
Good chatting with you on the Catharism article. Keep the coalfires burning! ThePeg 12:00, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
A tragedy! They've done it! The Fruitloopian article is no more! May their souls rest in peace with the Cathars, the Lollards, the Waldensians and all the other Seekers After Truth who have so brutally fallen foul of human intolerance. ;-( ThePeg 19:24, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
