User talk:GBYehuda

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is Gadi Ben-Yehuda's Talk Page with which he is well pleased.

Your attacks in the Interchange Fee article are uncalled for. I will also seek your ban since you clearly are here only to spam. stymiee (talk) 14:42, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Contents 1 February 2008 2 Dispute Resolution Filed 3 Notes on my altercation with Stymiee 4 Dispute resolution 5 Interchange fee

[edit] February 2008

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Interchange fee. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Onorem♠Dil 14:49, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Dispute Resolution Filed

A dispute resolution has been filed pertaining to the Interchange Fee article. stymiee (talk) 14:57, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Notes on my altercation with Stymiee

I am the editor with whom Stymiee is in a revert war.

I believe I have always acted in good faith and in accordance with Wikipedia's stated policies and general spirit. I always leave copious notes as to why I am making the changes to certain pages and have always contacted Stymiee when I have changed the page. Stymiee, conversely, has not acted in good faith. He has broken 3RR, has never left notes on the discussion page, and has never contacted me to discuss the changes I have made or that he wants to see made.

While this case moves forward, I would ask that any interested parties take a look at the discussion page and at how both Stymiee and I have conducted ourselves. My edits are well-researched, well-documented and represent a more complete, encyclopedic formulation of the Interchange Fee than Styimee's text.

Though I have left extensive notes on the discussino page, I would like to state my case briefly here:

My edits are not Vandalism.

My edits do not compromise the integrity of Wikipedia in any way. They are not obscene, crude, humorous, or nonsensical.

My edits allow other to assume good faith< about my edits.

I have always taken steps for visitors, administrators and even Stymiee to believe that I act in good faith. I have annotated my changes extensively, left notes for administrators and even reached out to Stymiee on his talk page as well as on this page.

Stymiee has shown himself to act in bad faith.

Stymiee has never left notes explaining why he reverts the text. I have never heard back from him on my own talk page, nor has he posted the reason that my edits should be removed. The history in his Discussion page shows that he has been often accused of acting in Bad Faith, and his refusal to talk or negotiate with me (or any other editor), to me, makes the strongest case of all.

GBYehuda (talk) 16:09, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Dispute resolution

Hi. You may want to have a look at the comments I left at User talk:Stymiee. Thanks. Tbo ¹⁵⁷(talk) 17:56, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Interchange fee

Hi, thanks for the message on my talk page. However, are you sure you have the right person? I have never edited the Interchange fee article, nor am I at all an "expert" on Interchange fees, I'm afraid. Best, Gwernol 01:05, 3 February 2008 (UTC)