User talk:Gb/Archive 5

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

The Wikipedia Signpost
Volume 4, Issue 23 — 2008-06-02

Archives·Newsroom·Tip line·Single-page·Subscribe
Archive
Archives
Archive 1 (29 May 2007)
Archive 2 (28 June 2007)
Archive 3 (15 July 2007)
Archive 4 (10 September 2007)


Contents

Sockpuppet

Kevizzle (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · block user · block log)
and
Chris126789‎ (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · block user · block log)
Seems pretty obvious to me. Are you going to list him? --Mud4t 09:38, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

September 2007

apologies for doing that. But c'mon, i took 2 hours doing my page which was strictly for PROFESSIONAL reason.

and im sorry but i cant find the talk link to get in contact with you properly.

THIS IS NO FORM OF VANDALISM! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kevizzle (talk • contribs)

stop getting on my case, alright?
The terms and conditions were broken on this site.
the guy who smokes pot keeps his page, may i ask why?
This site i thought was good, i thought it was very informative.
But does it constantly have people sat on the computer all day looking for wrong information?
If so, what a sucky job.
And no, i pressed EDIT on this page, i did not know it would have gave you a proper talk page.
I only understand how to make my own pages.
As for the vandalism on your page, i thought i was doing it in my OWN messages.
Thats how confusing this site is to a beginner.
And i'd appreciate not being talked down to thank you very much.
I'm not a child nor a dog, so please,
If you have nothing nice to say, then keep it to yourself and go insult somebody else.
Thank you for your time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kevizzle (talk • contribs)


Agreed, and for that i apologise.
But my friend told me i was eligible to make an entry.
And after spending 2 hours doing it, you can understand how frustrating it was for me to have it deleted.
Especially when it didn't even last a day.
Any recommendations where i can put information that i had on my entry without it being deleted? Kevizzle 10:29, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Disambiguation of article titles

For future reference: when creating an article, it's unnecessary to disambiguate the title unless an article with the same name already exists. (See MoS:DAB for guidelines.) I've moved the Ezio album articles you've created (except for Higher) and fixed all the backlinks. Cheers! Precious Roy 11:11, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Rather than move the page, I've added a hatnote at the top of the article. OK? Precious Roy 12:50, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Shakespeare metal

I removed the {{db-nonsense}} tag from this article. Yes, it's obviously a hoax or made up in school one day, but it is not unsalvageably incoherent, so it cannot be speedied, unfortunately. Regards, Melsaran (talk) 14:37, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

My userpage

  • Oops. I knew that. I was in a hurry, I guess. ^_^ 71.110.2.111 22:08, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

Misuse of WP:UAA

UAA is not for usernames you don't like or usernames that vaguely run afoul of the username policy. It is for names so blatantly disruptive that they need an administrator to immediately block them. Most username concerns should be handled by talking to the user and asking them to change their name.

If you do make a UAA report in the future, read the directions at the top of the page. You need to give a reason why the name needs to be blocked; "Inappropriate" isn't one. rspeer / ɹəədsɹ 21:39, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Please read the username policy. If you encounter a username that violates the policy, talking to the user is encouraged over blocking, in all but the most blatantly disruptive cases. rspeer / ɹəədsɹ 22:07, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

UAA Report

Hi. You recently reported User:Shmiglyqwertyuiop to WP:UAA. While the name does seem to be a violation of policy, on the grounds of being confusing, your report wasn't acutally valid under the guidance given at the top of the page. I've added a reason to the report, but in future please give a full reason based on the username policy, rather than simply stating "inappropriate". SamBC(talk) 21:42, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Good catch

Good catch; I accidentally posted on a user page instead of a user talk page. Thanks for catching.

Thibgc 21:00, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

Replying

What can I do to help wikipedia? Monobi 21:07, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for reverting vandalism on my userpage. — xaosflux Talk 23:46, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Field hockey template

Thanks so much for that. What a silly mistake of mine. Matt 19:50, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

Thank you

For the reversion of that horrible vandalism to my userpage, I didn't catch that myself. The sunder king 20:40, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Giles, thanks for moving the vandalism warning for me. --Zegoma beach 20:41, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism

No Problem Yboord028 20:47, 18 October 2007 (UTC)