User talk:Gazooki

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] November 2007

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Mary Shelley worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dekisugi (talk) 11:11, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] January 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Bacn (electronic), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Bacn (electronic) was changed by Gazooki (c) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-01-17T14:58:50+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 14:58, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Romeo and Juliet has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk | Contribs) 11:04, 17 March 2008 (UTC)


Please stop. If you continue to blank out (or delete portions of) page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Image:Edit Summary-2.png, you will be blocked from editing. Lradrama 11:08, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] April 2008

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Gmina Krapkowice, you will be blocked from editing. Epbr123 (talk) 10:12, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Mr charlse dasrwin

A tag has been placed on Mr charlse dasrwin, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Dawn Bard (talk) 13:42, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

Hi, the recent edit you made to Charles Darwin has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Enigma message Review 13:51, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Charles Darwin, you will be blocked from editing. DJ Clayworth (talk) 13:55, 23 April 2008 (UTC)


You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Antandrus (talk) 14:00, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "My idiot ginger rival hacked my account and has decided to edit major articles for attention. Dickhead."

Decline reason: "Given the long history of vandalism, this does not appear to be the case. — Yamla (talk) 14:17, 23 April 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.