User talk:GazMan7

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is a Wikipedia user talk page.

This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this talk page belongs to may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original talk page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:GazMan7.


Contents

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Denbigh school logo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Denbigh school logo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:26, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Comments on WP:BEDS

Hi, I've just come back from a wikibreak (for my own sanity), so apologies for not replying to your comments on WP:BEDS talk page sooner. Unfortunately there is probably less than a handful of us who are active in the project at the mo, so I'm afraid it's a case of us buckling down and getting on with it until we get more members. But not to get too disheartened, if a small village in Somerset with less than 100 residents can get to FA status, then there's no reason why we can't get Bedfordshire, Luton or Bedford to at least GA status. As well as looking up info for the Bedford, Kempston and Wootton articles, I am working on completing infobox data on the civil parishes in Bedfordshire pages.

In the meantime what do you think about proposing the following;

  • A new template to replace Template:Places in Bedfordshire. Now that most of the settlements in Bedfordshire have their own article, the template looks a little crowded and takes up a lot of page space. Maybe something like this?
  • Revamping Template:WikiProject Bedfordshire so that, like most of the other counties WPs, it just has the class and importance of the article. Not all articles require an infobox, and how weeks (or months or years) has South Bedfordshire been 'Collaboration of the week'?

Anyway chin up! Regards --Starrycupz (talk) 09:38, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Chris Mitchell's Testicles

I'm sorry, but I cant' be held responsible for what other people using the same ISP as me are doing. IPs in this range change roughly once per week. 81.107.98.10 (talk) 16:26, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Let's be careful out there

When you moved the article on the archaeological site Cantona and put a disambiguation page in its place, a lot of Mesoamerican articles suddenly pointed to a disambiguation page. If you make a move of this sort, please clean-up the links after the move. Thanks, Madman (talk) 23:02, 22 May 2008 (UTC)