Talk:Gawad Kalinga
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
It is requested that a photograph or photographs be included in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in Philippines may be able to help! |
| The Free Image Search Tool (FIST) may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
 |
This article is within the scope of Tambayan Philippines, the WikiProject and notice board for topics related to the Philippines. To participate, visit the Tambayan for more information. |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale. |
| High | This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale. |
There seems to be a lack of neutrality in the section under "Criticism". What's with all the quotation marks around certain proper nouns ("Sir Martin Perez", for example, who really IS a teacher at the PSHS)? Or is this just another style problem? In any case, I've removed those details first, and corrected some other style errors. Mission imaginable 18:14, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:GK.jpg
Image:GK.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 04:53, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Gkparaiso.jpg
Image:Gkparaiso.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 05:10, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] At last, Vatican reprimand
On April 18, 2008, CBCP officer Antipolo Bishop Gabriel Reyes, chair of the CBCP Episcopal Commission on the Laity stated that the Vatican's March 11 Pontifical Council for the Laity letter to CFC president, Jose Tale ‘corrects’ Couples for Christ’s ‘GK’ focus from spiritual or its “overemphasis on social work,” chiding it for its “erroneous steps,” specifically rebuking its receiving of funds from pharmaceutical companies (who support or manufacture contraceptives).[1] --Florentino floro (talk) 07:46, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Neutrality
Whoever wrote the bulk of the article should go back and read the core policy about neutrality. This article is written entirely as a glorification of this project. I say that with the utmost confidence precisely because I know nothing of the organization. But the article is full of peacock terms and attacks on Gawad Kalinga's critics. My favourite example is certainly Victor Agustin, a columnist of the Manila Standard Today known to write unverified reports. This article is way way below Wikipedia's standards for objectivity. Pichpich (talk) 23:36, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
