Talk:Gavin Esler

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale. (Add assessment comments)
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale within the BBC WikiProject.
Tasks for WikiProject BBC: Here are some tasks you can do: Merge: Suggested merge of Criticism of the BBC into BBC controversies (Discuss) Cleanup: Newsnight, BBC Prime, BBC Two Northern Ireland Expand: All 10 start-class BBC articles with Top importance - see here, BBC Lifestyle Stubs: Stub-Class BBC articles Update: BBC Portal NPOV: Criticism of the BBC (See comments) Other: Ensure all our articles have the talk page template added to their talk pages. Add free use images for biographical articles. Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes. Get our new task force on BBC Sitcoms going. Add references to Goa Mix (see assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC.

This page appears awfully at pains to point out Esler's impartiality, i wonder if this article was written by the BBC press office. I thought everyone has a personal bias one way or another.

I agree. The article reads like a biography from a BBC website. I note that a Google search does not reveal the term "neo-con apologist" being applied to Esler. The only reference it unearths for Esler being a "left-wing anti-American" is a generalised comment on a blog regarding the BBC. Without sources I don't think these quotes can stand.

Even if these epithets are real, they show nothing about Esler, or his alleged lack of bias. It's common practice for entities taking criticism from two sides to imply, by mentioning both directions of criticism, that they cancel one another out. This isn't the case, not least because it gives no clue as to how much criticism of either sort has occurred.

On a separate point, I do not believe Esler's interviewing style on Newsnight can be accurately characterised as "confrontational". He is far less confrontational than Jeremy Paxman, and not noticeably more so than Kirsty Wark. In any case, currently the article attempts to link this spurious claim of being "confrontational" with even-handedness. Even if the premise were true (I don't believe it is), the conclusion would not follow.

As a consequence of these considerations, I am removing the final paragraph.

Stuarta 16:44, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

I should also say that entry was extremely poorly punctuated. While it still isn't very well written, I've tried to eliminate the various run-on sentences.

Stuarta 16:52, 15 May 2006 (UTC)