User talk:Garzj019

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents 1 2d/2nd Infantry Division 2 62d Medical Brigade 3 Lord's Prayer 4 Unspecified source for Image:62d_Med_Bde_Shoulder_Sleeve3.gif 5 May 2008

[edit] 2d/2nd Infantry Division

Well I can't vouch for the signs, but their own website used "2nd." And please note that I was not reverting you out of "general rule" for the population, but rather out of Wikipedia's manual of style for numbers. Although it is also useful to note that rules on what to refer to things as on Wikipedia are trumped by what said things are referred to as in the outside world, should they differ. I won't revert you again, although it would be useful to place your reasoning in the edit summary or the talk page of the article, so it doesn't appear you are just randomly altering the format of the numbers. Cheers. Someguy1221 20:50, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] 62d Medical Brigade

If you wanted the article to be assessed all you had to do was drop a message at the project talkpage; someone would have been more than happy to help. I have assessed the article as start class, so it is no longer unassessed. If you would like a second opinion you may drop a message at the parent article page and a neutral party will reevalute the assessment. Also, the article could do with some cleanup; there are hardly any links to Wikipedia articles in the article name space. TomStar81 (Talk) 06:52, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Lord's Prayer

Please note that the section headings are stated to use the 1662 BCP translation of the text, so "which art in heaven" is correct, and although the other one you changed was wrong previously, you amended it to the ELLC translation, not the BCP, so I've changed that too. David Underdown 07:48, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

I didn't insert the headings, but the person that did decided to use the 1662 wordings - and there is a comment to that effect in the article. There may have been earlier translations into English, but the BCP is certainly the first to have become widely known. It's nothing to do with the fact that I'm an Anglican. David Underdown 15:59, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:62d_Med_Bde_Shoulder_Sleeve3.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:62d_Med_Bde_Shoulder_Sleeve3.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:25, 28 March 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MECU≈talk 15:25, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] May 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to 62nd Medical Brigade (United States) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks.  Marlith (Talk)  01:01, 13 May 2008 (UTC)