Talk:Gary Schwartz

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.

Biography Portal

Stub

This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]

This article is supported by the Science and academia work group.

This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Biography because it uses a stub template.

If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page.
If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WPBiography}} template, removing {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.

[edit] team fortress 2?

i heard he voiced the demoman and the heavy classes? Yes? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.126.8.90 (talk) 19:08, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Controversial views

Scientist with very controversial views. This article needs better development of the ideas and experiments that he's done, but I admit I am not as good at explaining out these kind of scientific works. I also think an entry should be made on The VERITAS Research Program. Bobak 01:16, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

"Dr. Schwartz's research has garnered him much criticism from skeptics such as James Randi, Robert Todd Carroll, Paul Kurtz and Ray Hyman." None of the people quoted above with the exception of Hyman are scientists, nor do any of them conduct their own experiments or research. Anyone can criticize any research based on a priori beliefs, but I'm not sure why this is worthy of inclusion just because they consider themselves 'skeptics' and have managed to attract publicity in this (non-scientific) capacity. Again, Ray Hyman's views on this matter should be taken into account since he has criticized the actual methodology of the experiment in some detail. His criticisms and Gary's response should probably be included. TC

But the controversy is notable. We aren't saying the skeptical viewpoint is valid or not, but only that there has been a notable controversy involving said skeptics. I'll change the heading. Martin^phi _{(Talk Ψ Contribs)} 04:39, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Geraldo at Large and asking for $3.3 million

I added in information on the Geraldo at Large segment as well as that he asked the parents of a dead child for $3.3 million. C56C (talk) 22:47, 7 January 2008 (UTC)