Talk:Gang bang pornography
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Pornography, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to pornography-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] |
| Low | This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. |
[edit] Notability concern?
Valrith, I'm not sure what you're concerned about. The films won multiple AVN Awards for best selling porn movies of their year, there's been an international documentary, and lots of non-trivial attention by unrelated sources, all described in the text, from AVN to AIN, to Salon magazine, to Howard Stern. That clearly meets Wikipedia:Notability - what am I missing? --AnonEMouse (squeak) 17:16, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
- Well, I have to agree there's been more than a little coverage of it. I still don't see that as establishing notability... Valrith 18:22, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
- The note you added says: "The best way to address this concern is to reference published, third-party sources about the subject." That's been done. What am I missing? --AnonEMouse (squeak) 19:10, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
- It's a template - I didn't write it. I still don't think this subject is notable, but I can't marshal significant arguments to that effect at this time. I've removed the tag... Valrith 05:17, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you! --AnonEMouse (squeak) 05:25, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
- It's a template - I didn't write it. I still don't think this subject is notable, but I can't marshal significant arguments to that effect at this time. I've removed the tag... Valrith 05:17, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
- The note you added says: "The best way to address this concern is to reference published, third-party sources about the subject." That's been done. What am I missing? --AnonEMouse (squeak) 19:10, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Worlds biggest gangbang2.jpg
Image:Worlds biggest gangbang2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 09:29, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
