Talk:Ganapathi Sachchidananda

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hang on Please...

[edit] Swamiji is a very prominent Spiritual Person in India

Swamiji is a very prominent Spiritual Guru in India and has a vast following of devotees in India,USA , Europe and West Indies. Give me some more time to edit this article to Wiki Standards. This article is definitely not Patent nonsense and Please cooperate.

Thanks...

[edit] Rewritten

This is a previously deleted article for copyvio. I have rewritten it and provided references. He is a very prominent person. Please guide me if I need to prove more for the article to exist. Iamthere 01:47, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

I think one of the most important things here is to ensure an NPOV-wording. I realize that 'Swamiji' is a title of affection and respect, but I find it unencyclopedic. Please use a more distanced tone, and refer to him as 'Swami Ganapathi', 'Swami Sachchidananda', 'Swami Ganapathi Sachchidananda' or some combination thereof. Varoon Arya 17:40, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Nada Venu.jpeg

Image:Nada Venu.jpeg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 22:05, 6 November 2007 (UTC)