Talk:GameDev.net

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the GameDev.net article.

Article policies
Famicom style controller This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale.

This article doesn't seem to be in standard wikipedia format / style.

Neither is your comment :-) Wouter Lievens 11:54, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Removing redlinks to founders

I have removed redlinks to Kevin Hawkins, Dave Astle, and Michael Tanczos primarily because I don't know who they are. Someone more familiar with GameDev can add them back in if one thinks they are notable enough to merit their own encyclopedia biography articles. For example, I could arguably consider NeHe to be notable since his site is considered the de facto OpenGL red book for newbies. Tuxide 01:20, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

No, the red book is considered the red book for noobies, NeHe's site is considered garbage that spreads sloppy coding practices.capnmidnight 06:29, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
This is not a forum, please do not post off-topic messages here. Tuxide 06:47, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
There's nothing off-topic about it. And being the talk page, this is essentially a forum. Promit 06:38, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
Remember that article talk pages are provided to coordinate the article's improvement only, and are not for engaging in discussion of off-topic matters not related to the main article. User talk pages are more appropriate for non-article-related discussion topics. Please do not use this page as a discussion forum for off-topic matters. See talk page guidelines.
Tuxide 07:32, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
And of course Promit, being one of those egotistical and immature people who run the GameDev.net chat room, is always right. I'd back off before he tears your ass up for warning him. 67.168.216.252 06:56, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
Gee, I wonder who 67.168.216.252 could be? Please don't use Wikipedia for yet further harassment, good sir. Thanks. Zombie81
The irony is palpable. And about the forum thing, I didn't mean it quite like that ("discussion for the sake of discussion"). What I meant was that "talk" and "discussion" are essentially the same thing, so this page pretty mcuh serves as a discussion forum about the article it's attached to. Back on topic though, I suppose this page could use with a little expansion. I'll probably tackle it tomorrow. Promit 10:06, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
How is my comment off topic? You're talking about links that should or should not be included. You said that you considered NeHe possibly notable for inclusion and I disputed it. I'm going to reinclude Dave Astle's red link because he was involved in the development of the QUALCOMM BREW/OpenGL platform for mobile gaming. capnmidnight 18:56, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
I really don't see how the founders have merit outside of gamedev. Qualcomm brew doesn't seem to have a page on wikipedia. Any pages about these fellows probably would never be able to be expanded passed a stub. I would side with Tuxide, I don't think you should red link these people. --Numsgil 06:40, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
How hard did you look? BREW capnmidnight 17:28, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Requested move

I propose we move the article from 'GameDev' to 'GameDev.net' as that's the name of the site, as consistent with the branding, company name, etc. I'm proposing rather than doing it myself because (a) I'm new at this and (b) I may have a conflict of interests (though I'll be surprised if anyone calls me on it, as this seems innocuous). Any objections, or anyone willing to Be Bold and do it? Ubermammal 21:39, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

This article has been renamed from GameDev to GameDev.net as the result of a move request. --Stemonitis 05:10, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] "hillbillies"

Why does it say that some of the contributors are "hillbillies"? It sounds like a weird thing to put in an encyclopedia.SuperGerbil 23:42, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

I think it was vandalism...203.2.182.254 05:54, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Culture within GameDev.net

Is it possible to use the above section of this talk page as a citation for the kind of arrogance that is common within the GameDev.net community? See I got banned a long time ago for acting like an idiot, so now I just post in Wikipedia pages to get back at them. 203.2.182.254 05:57, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] This is not a sales pitch

I'm a regular of gamedev.net, and quite happy with their service, but this was sounding wayyy to much like a sales pitch. I added some demographic information, removed the 'hillbillies', and adjusted some of the more 'pitchy' sounding things. Still needs some work, but at least its not quite as biased.

Also. I elaborated on the 4 elements contest, since that is one of the items that caused the site to gain in notoriety I do believe.

paulcesar 209.143.33.130 18:39, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Gdnet.png

Image:Gdnet.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 08:13, 7 November 2007 (UTC)