Talk:Galtier Plaza
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shopping Centers, which is an attempt to better organize and unify articles relating to enclosed shopping malls, outdoor shopping centers, and dead malls. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the assessment scale. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received an importance rating on the assessment scale. | |
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Minnesota, which aims to improve all articles related to Minnesota. | |
| B | This article has been rated as b-Class on the assessment scale. | |
| Low | This article is on a subject of low-importance within Minnesota articles. | |
|
This article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need. |
||
 |
This article covers subjects of relevance to Architecture. To participate, visit the WikiProject Architecture for more information. The current monthly improvement drive is Johannes Itten. | |
| B | This article has been rated as b-Class on the assessment scale. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received an importance rating on the assessment scale. | |
This page seems to be written by the property owner. It's certainly good info, but Galtier isn't quite as succesful as the article makes it out to be. Much of it is still empty and the retail era has pretty much ended at Galtier.
I concur that this article is quite biased and should be flagged and rewritten. Galtier Plaza is a rather desolate place, and the promise of "when it shelters the mix of activities promised, it will fulfill its potential for vitality in a most important place" is terribly optimistic. It is totally biased and needs to have lots of information added or most of this should be struck from the wikirecord.
Agreed. This reads like it was written by a PR specialist. If you remove most of the biased words and change the tone of the piece to conform to wikipedia standards, you have almost nothing left.
I will try to add more information. The article leaves a few key points out, such as bankruptcy litigation and shifts between owners.
