User talk:Gabriel Duvall

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I am not the Gabriel Duvall.

Contents

[edit] Ronald Reagan edits

Unfortunately, that wasn't as helpful a link as you might have wished. Could you provide me with an actual ink to the diff, please? - Arcayne (cast a spell) 21:36, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

See Talk:Ronald Reagan; do a search for my username or for the time I pointed out. Gabriel Duvall (talk) 22:46, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] CyberAnth Wikiquette

Hey Gabriel, I have listed User:CyberAnth at the Wikiquette alert page for his behavior at the Jeremiah Wright controversy page, and more recent dealings with me at the Ronald Reagan page. I thought you may be interested to comment: here. Thanks, Happyme22 (talk) 21:04, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] CfD nomination of Category:Supreme Court clerks

Category:Supreme Court clerks, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. –

[edit] Regarding my Federalist Society edits

I was simply trying to verify whether certain people were members of the FS - it's hard to find an objective source listing "all current members" given that the Fed-Soc.org main site isn't very helpful in listing, and I couldn't find any others. What are the problems with Huffington Post and EIR? --Andrewlp1991 (talk) 05:42, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Income tax in the United States

I think the removal of the chart should at least have some mention on the talk page. Please expand.. why is it inaccurate (could this be corrected by a better description in the caption)? It appears to just follow the 2008 income tax brackets also listed in the article, why is this original research? I see no new synthesis of data. I did not create or place the image, but Dejo took a little effort to do so. I think we at least owe it a discussion point; otherwise, I'll consider it a drive by and revert the material. Morphh (talk) 12:28, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

I've replied in the posted areas and at this point I disagree with your interpretation. The image appears to be a graph of the effective tax rate using the income tax brackets for Single and Married filing jointly. It is a graph of the first two columns in the 2008 table. It does not violate OR as it creates no new synthesis of data. It is the data, just in a graph form, which is completely fine if we describe what is presented. Morphh (talk) 12:58, 13 May 2008 (UTC)