User talk:Gabeyc

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

Stop doubting me!

Please stop saying that user:Gabeyc is my puppet! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gabeyg (talkcontribs)


IOrange should be true article, but administrator are too quick in not caring..

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Making IOrange again is because it is true article and well, my friend told me about this case."


Decline reason: "No unblock reason provided. --Kinu t/c 20:45, 13 May 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Also, this block is not fair because it is based on bias information only by looking one article or assuming sock puppetry. (By the way, sock is also very rude word if to use in real life.)"


Decline reason: "No unblock reason provided. Allegations of sockpuppetry have been discussed in previous versions of this talk page and also in the unblock request below. --Kinu t/c 20:45, 13 May 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

Also..

Release the block at least for my user page. It's illegal to hurt other people's areas although Wikipedia rules say.

Also..

Many administrator is not always good at checking or knowing the article.

Unblock..

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "By the way, I'm not sockpuppet of Gabeyg."


Decline reason: "The two contribution histories (including attempts to (re)create IOrange) seem to disagree with your claim. If a checkuser has not been run, I recommend doing so to allay this once and for all. Until then, request denied. --Kinu t/c 20:43, 13 May 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

  • Also, please do not abuse the unblock template. Repeated abuse will result in protection of this talk page. --Kinu t/c 20:45, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
    • Since you chose to abuse the unblock template (replacing my review of the last one with an unreviewed template), I have protected this page to prevent further abuse. --Kinu t/c 04:42, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "No noise is going'round. I was proven innocent, therefore I should be released. Also Iorange backrupted, and got dead sentence, so no need argue for creating that article. Best of all, I have to admit that I supported gabeyg too much, and i'm sorry to NawlinWiki, but not to Nlu; Nlu has to be removed from admin since he/she is not keeping accepting different POV and being NPOV."


Decline reason: "Your reasons do not persuade me that you are likely to make useful edits, and neither do your edits below, in which you place a false unblocked template and a message with a forged signature. — FisherQueen (Talk) 12:55, 22 September 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

Y

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

reason

Request handled by: Gabeyc 10:11, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

Why did you block him? He made good edits! Mathbot 23:46, 21 September 2006 (UTC)This edit was actually made by Gabeyc.