Talk:Gabrielle Roth

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Recreated article

I have recreated this article with much more information. Frankly, anyone in the fields Gabrielle Roth is active in would be surprised that her notability would be questioned. Just the fact that she has three books published by non-vanity presses should be enough, but she is the founder of a recording studio, producer of over a dozen CDs and numerous videos (at least two of which have been reviewed by the New York Times), the founder of her own school of dance and movement and her own center for instruction in them, a world-wide lecturer and performer, and a faculty member of Omega, Kripalu and Esalen. She is well-known in the New Age movement, world music field, Neo-Pagan community, and other circles from indie music to theatre. I hope that the additional data I've added to the article will prevent further proposals of deletion. If not, at least don't delete it so quickly, so one of the many people familiar with her carreer may add to it. BTW, I have no connection at all with her, have never booked or spoken with her, and know her solely from her reputation and her works.Rosencomet 20:36, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Oh, and thanks to User:NawlinWiki, who deleted the article as it was, for posting the original text on my talk page so I could work on it some more.Rosencomet 20:42, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Deletion prod

I have deleted the proposed deletion prod on this page, since I object to the deletion of this article. I believe it passes the criteria for notability and is not at all a vanity article. My reasons can be found in the text above placed when the article was recently deleted after a 5-day prod. I added more data including several reviews, interviews, etc. Rosencomet 21:54, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

The user who prodded the article has a history of prodding notable articles so I don't think there is anything to discuss unless the prodder returns. —Viriditas | Talk 15:25, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

I've removed the RFC tag as it seems this is handled. JodyB _{Roll, Tide, Roll} 18:45, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] 5 rhythms

Good to see this page recreated. However there is little mention of the five rhythms, which I guess is here most infultental work. There was a 5Rhythms page which was deleated [1], apparently without discussion. The answers.com mirror shows what the page looked like. I'm thinking of taking this to WP:DRV which would go a lot easier if there was some newspaper articles or such like to show notability. I have found a couple of academic pubs

• Cook, S., Ledger, K., Scott, N. (2003) ‘Women’s experience of 5 Rhythms dance and the effects on their emotional wellbeing’ (Book) Pubs U.K. Advocacy Network, Sheffield[2]
• Pract Midwife. 2007 Mar;10(3):20, 22-3. The ecstasy of spirit: five rhythms for healing. Henley-Einion A. University of the West of England.

--Salix alba (talk) 17:30, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Now on deletion review at Wikipedia:Deletion review#5Rhythms. --Salix alba (talk) 22:21, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Now recreated. 5Rhythms. --Salix alba (talk) 16:28, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Glad to see you working on this, Salix alba. I didn't mean to give 5 Rhythms short shrift. I figured a link to it was enough; but if you want to expand a section here for a better description with a direction to the full article, more power to you. (Heck, I'm just happy I was able to stop this one from being deleted.)Rosencomet (talk) 17:53, 22 December 2007 (UTC)