Talk:Gabriel Nassif

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Start	This article has been rated as start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
	This article is supported by the Sports and games work group.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magic: The Gathering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Magic: The Gathering articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Authenticity check: A search reveals that the phrase "regarded by many" appears in the text. Is the phrase a symptom of a dubious statement? Could a source be quoted instead? Perhaps the "many" could be identified? Might text be edited to more genuinely reflect specific facts? Wetman

Corrected the sentence. Fluorhydric 00:21, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

Today's edit is win.

"Gabriel Nassif costs 2 French mana to play and gives all creatures +50/+50 and quad double strike."

It really does.

[edit] Possible NPOV violation

I believe the following statement violates the Wikipedia:Neutral point of view:

He won the tournament, despite playing a poorly built deck.

It is a biased statememnt, without reference. What is "poorly built"? According to who? How can it be poorly built if it won a tournament? Whether or not a deck is poorly built is a matter of opinion, and thus subject to bias. Should this statement be reworded or removed? Flashstorm 22:43, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

That is a POV statement without a source. I've attempted to look for a source that the deck was considered poorly built, but I haven't even found anything about the event yet. Jay32183 23:16, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

So, perhaps should it be removed until such a source is found? Or a citation needed notice? I'm personally still not convinced that it doesn't violate NPOV. Flashstorm 00:12, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

I've removed it since this is a living person. We can't have Wikipedians belittling his deck building abilities. Jay32183 00:15, 20 March 2007 (UTC)