Talk:Gabilondo Ruby (pistol)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Firearms; If you would like to join us, please visit the project page where you can find a list of open tasks. If you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale
Additional information: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked

	This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.
Additional information and associated task forces: Associated task forces (periods and conflicts): World War I task force

There appears to be quite a bit of incorrect information here, as well as a lack of sources.

I don't know enough to edit this page properly, but if I could, I would tag it for someone more knowledgeable than I.

1st section: Present tense. 2nd/3rd section: Past sense. Huh? which one is real?Samurai 004 07:30, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

---

I think only the first sentence is present tense, otherwise the page is written about an old gun from WWI. I don't know I made the page along time ago and I used a gun book as reference... I'll try and track it down for a source. What information is inaccurate? Thenewdeal87 18:43, 11 January 2007 (UTC) 12:43, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

---

Hello... I started out by correcting a grammatical error in the other page about this weapon, and ended up expanding the article and documenting its citations. Like web surfing, only more dangerous. I noted the merge tag, and decided to go ahead and join the two articles; I redirected from here to there because Ruby pistol, as a more generic term, seemed appropriate, based on what I read in the sources. (Although it should probably be 'Ruby (pistol)'). The content of this article was joined, fairly successfully I think, with what I found there and what I researched.

Please make yourselves at home on the new article page, and feel free to reverse my decision if you have significant cause. I am neither a weapons hobbyist nor expert, and I lay no claim whatsoever to the subject matter. Although I am reasonably confident that there are no errors of fact, my lack of topical knowledge may well be reflected in errors of interpretation and focus. 69.49.44.11 18:48, 13 December 2006 (UTC)