Talk:G12 Vision
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] General Lacks
I find many lacks in this article, most of which I'm unable to fulfill due to lack of information.
Cesar Castellanos murder attempt.
How the vision was delivered to Cesar.
Visions written in The revelation of the cross book.
Literature used in the organization.
--Chepech 21:30, 21 May 2007 (UTC)chepech
I too find this page lacking in critical philosophies, goals, methods, and material regarding Cesar Castellanos's g12 vision. I shall in the near future make a comprehensive effort to update and monitor this page.
[edit] My proposed revert
Hello, I propose we revert edits by User:G12vision (to the last version by 204.83.222.147). The User G12vision (COI?) removed a number of citations, and added a number of unsourced statements as well as a number of possibly biased sources. I'm going to do the revert tomorrow unless somebody disagrees. ~a (user • talk • contribs) 20:03, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry, I didn't check talk page. Yes, I agree! peterl 05:02, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
Artfish (talk) 20:55, 7 December 2007 (UTC) I am one of those who occasionally returns to view this page and check on its revisions. The G12 movement is highly controversial, and this page needs to reflect that. The overall tone of it should be neutral, while quoting positive and negative facts. Yet again, it is the G12 enthusiasts who have come back and vandalised the page to take out anything remotely critical or even questioning. I am removing all of Generacion12's edits. WIKIPEDIA IS NOT G12'S PROPAGANDA PLATFORM!!! Neither is it an anti-G12 platform, but nobody from the other side has tried to remove all the positive info and turn it into one. The censorship only comes from one side [User Artfish 7 December 2007
Re: The current dispute between Peterl and Progdog: As I stated before it is important that this page stays broadly neutral and factual. I have edited this page before when it has been attacked by G12 supporters who have removed any negative points, links etc - or made wild sweeping statements of their own! Apart from once removing the word "satanic" from the text, I have never had to do the same to G12 opponents. Progdog obviously has some knowledge and relevant factual material to contribute, but must avoid the statements of personal opinion and the emotive language - as G12 supporters have regularly been reminded before. Think carefully about how you are putting your points - and remember this is an encyclopaedia - not a discussion forum. I hope that others will leave any such, carefully considered edits stand. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Artfish (talk • contribs) 17:23, 27 March 2008 (UTC)