User talk:Futurix/Archive

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Talk:Suppressive_Person

Please forward your exact arguments on Talk:Suppressive_Person. I did respond to your POV. --Olberon 13:14, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

Done - see provided comparison. Futurix 15:04, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
You are not coming with exact information. Will not do. What information did I remove? --Olberon 16:55, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
Clarified in the discussion page for the article. Futurix 17:13, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Borland Delphi & 58.169.56.98

I believe this person is reverting the article in an attempt to quietly re-add the Protel and Altium Designer links. The addition of these two products was what initially prompted me to propose clearing the list -- I have never heard of either of them. Further, a bit of investigation shows that they're actually the same product[1]. So the question is if this Altium Designer is actually notable enough to be in the list, or if this is a software developer trying to get free publicity. -- Steven Fisher 23:45, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

Well, Altium Designer is a very specialist product, so I don't think it is really notable. And definitely not both of them at the same time. Futurix 09:31, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Attempting to get into communication

As part of the mediation process, it behooves us editors to be in communication. This is an attempt to get into communication with you. I see you have communiated with others, here on your discussion page, about Scientology pages. I have mentioned your name here in an effort to communicate in an area of mutual interest. Terryeo 21:06, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

Well, I will see what I can do there. Futurix 09:20, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] minesweaper

u be that's why i'm attacking the images.Yes i ment 1.ther not the same.first is a general that sayes that a split was sujested.the others are saying wich section are proposed for the split 2.The logic of the policy is, that a singel lawsut,even unjustified,would be extrimly damaging for the hole project.anual bujet of wikipedia is (i think) a cople of 100 thousands,you can find detailes at wikimedia.so oficial policy on copyright is extreme as a mater of prevention.

it's not recomended to refer to other articles too justifie a position, the other articles may be in breech of a rule.i think is cauld "if pokemon article exist then i'm corect"(or something like that).

have nice edits.chears--Pixel ;-) 20:01, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

I was not justifying my position (these articles justify yours). Anyway, this is clear bias in favour of open source software - and I'm not going to participate in such practice.
And do something with your English, dammit! It's like you are making a mistake in every second word! How can you edit Wikipedia with such horrible spelling??? Futurix 20:16, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

I'm dyslexic,imposible, even if my life depended on it,in my native language is no beter.May be that's why i'm attacking the images.Yes i now, i ment it in general.have a nice day.--Pixel ;-) 21:14, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

Sorry, didn't know that you are dyslexic... Futurix 22:50, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Comment added at Talk:Solitaire

I added a reply to your Talk:Solitaire question about the image being used in the article. I looked into the Minesweeper image dispute since it seemed related, and I'm going to do what I can to help resolve the dispute. -FunnyMan 15:58, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Yocam

Yocam is a bit odd, isn't he? I mean, there's no problem with someone editing their own article, but then after he added so much to it, he removed all the content from the article! (look in the history). Do you think he'll try and remove it again? — Wackymacs 15:36, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

I think he realized that writing his own bio is a PR nightmare and tries to cover up his tracks. Well... Too late! Futurix 21:44, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Goldfrapp

Hi, may I suggest putting something on the Goldfrapp talk page about your issues with the recent edits? Also, it might be good to put something on the editors talk page. I have to say I agree with you. -- Jbattersby 21:14, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Well, he was already banned, so it's too late I guess. Futurix 11:03, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
Banned again, thankfully. Whenever he (or his aliases) come back, just report him in Administrator intervention against vandalism, which I've done. There's no reason why people should have to clean up his mess every day. Sheesh! Keep up the good work  :-) - eo 20:19, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
Good news :-)
Thank you! Futurix 21:14, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Adam Rin

I really hate to say this, since the article's crap, but you can't Prod the same article twice. You'll need to take it to AFD. Fan-1967 02:31, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

All right :-( Futurix 02:35, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Contact info?

There doesn't seem to be any contact info on your website or in the about dialog in FuturixImager in case people want to reach you about bugs, suggestions, requests, etc.

Is that intentional? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.215.231.177 (talk) 07:37, 11 December 2006 (UTC).

Not really, my website is supposed to be in "re-design" - which means that I closed old one, but do not have time to open new one... I'll post my e-mail to my websites today. Futurix 09:59, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Enya page

How is it that other sites are allowed to advertise in the external links area such as Out of the Blue and Exile - Enya forum yet when I add a BuzzJack link on there you delete it straight away? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Most haunted (talk • contribs) 18:45, 15 December 2006 (UTC).

Out of the Blue was just added, Exile I did not notice - both reverted now. Futurix 19:48, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Ahh I see. Do the links have to be "official" then? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Most haunted (talk • contribs)

Well, not official, but notable. Not just a generic forum. Futurix 01:30, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Vote for deletion of ru-sib "language"

I authorise that this vote is mine. Futurix 13:02, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Invite to WikiProject Spam

Hey there! I saw you reverting or removing linkspam. Thanks! If you're interested, come visit us in Wikipedia:WikiProject Spam so we can work together in our efforts to clean spam from Wikipedia. Hu12 19:04, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

I'll check it :-) Futurix 19:19, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Reverting of Features of Windows Vista page

The consistent manner in which you revert any page tags that other editors put in place is not proper Wikipedia Etiquette. While I don't share the view that this article is written like an advertisement, I do feel that it's too long. I don't want to get into an edit war that gets the entire page locked down from all edits, which would defeat the purpose of trying to summarise the page. So what do you say? How about we draft up a mutual plan for revision and work on it. If not, I would recommend submitting this page for general comment. Nja247 (talk • contribs) 11:37, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

I'm not against shortening, I just don't want page content to suffer. See my latest comment on that page. Futurix 11:45, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Request for Mediation

A Request for Mediation to which you are a party was not accepted and has been delisted. You can find more information on the mediation subpage, Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/List of male performers in gay porn films.
For the Mediation Committee, ^demon[omg plz]
This message delivered by MediationBot, an automated bot account operated by the Mediation Committee to perform case management. If you have questions about this bot, please contact the Mediation Committee directly.
This message delivered: 04:15, 22 March 2007 (UTC).


[edit] Business oligarchs

I don't want to get into a slanging match over this [2], but I don't see racism in the text. Plus it has a link. Can you enlighten me? Thanks.--Shtove 10:16, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

The fact that it has a link changes nothing. Obviously I used the wrong word - not racism but anti-semitism. Futurix 09:34, 4 April 2007 (UTC)