User talk:Fusionxking

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This user is a sockpuppet or a meatpuppet of Verdict as confirmed by the user's edits, and has been blocked indefinitely.
See contribs — page moves — all logs — block log


This page has been temporarily protected from editing to prevent this blocked user from causing disruption.

 This page is currently protected from editing to prevent Fusionxking (talk • contribs • block logauto) from using it to make disruptive edits or continuing to abuse the {{unblock}} template.
If you have come here to issue a new message to this user, it means the block has expired. Please unprotect the page, ask an administrator to do so, or request unprotection here.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Lie"

Decline reason: "The way you're talking, you're clearly a sock of somebody. At some point, it doesn't matter to me who of. – Luna Santin (talk) 17:53, 22 March 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

Yes, Verdict (talk · contribs) has been caught lying repeatedly. This is no grounds for an unblock of this abusive sockpuppet of a user banned by community consensus, though. --Yamla 17:34, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

This admin is lying. He has no proof i am Verdict and he tryies to keep many people out of Wikipedia by saying they are not welcome and blocking them. If it was not for him. It would not be so many sockpuppets on the pedia. He should not have the right to be an admin. He gives orders thinking he is the boss what he does is not right and i have seen him get many critics on his talk page.

See [1] and WP:BAN. --Yamla 17:35, 22 March 2007 (UTC)