Talk:Fundamental Rights in India
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
There does not seem to be any discussion of the current status of much of the population of India in regards to these rights, i.e., that most people are unable to practically realize many or all of these rights. Is that within the scope of this article? — goethean ॐ 17:05, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
- Done. --May the Force be with you! Shreshth91(review me!) 10:03, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] GA status
Thigs to work on now:
- Please try to bring the lead section closer to the WP:LEAD norm.
- Please define begar beside it in parenthesis.
- All else is good, well, meets the criteria. Lincher 18:37, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Review
Can easily reach A class with some effort. Throughout comments:
- The first sentence of the article should contain a brief summary of what is it. In this case - The Fundamental Rights in India enshrined in the Part III of the Constitution of India > The Fundamental Rights in India are... ....enshrined in the Part III of the Constitution of India.
- Wiki's aren't reliable sources as they may be edited/vandalized anytime. This might be a better source for the constitution.
- The term "State" includes all authorities within the territory of India. It includes the... - The term "State" includes all authorities within the territory of India — ....
- I advice formatting all the reference constantly using the cite templates.
- The Fundamental Rights have been criticised for many reasons - Unbold "Fundamental Rights". No need for "Child labour" to be bolded earlier in the article as well.
- Any reference for the 1919 events?
- ..the Supreme Court held that "the state - When does the quote end?
- The India flag is irrelevant to the "Cultural and educational rights" section and thus confusing.
- ...religion, caste, creed, colour or sex, ...Articles 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18 - Serial comma.
- All image captions containing full sentences should have a period per WP:MOS.
- Even an unaided minority institution... - POV.
- These provisions act as a check both on State action as well as the action of private individuals - "both" shouldn't be followed by "as well as". Michaelas10Respect my authoritah 16:08, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] GA status reviewed — kept
This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. The article history has been updated to reflect this review. Regards, Ruslik 08:54, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
Categories: Wikipedia good articles | Wikipedia CD Selection-GAs | GA-Class Good articles | Social sciences and society good articles | Old requests for peer review | GA-Class Indian politics articles | Unknown-importance Indian politics articles | WikiProject Indian politics articles | Indian portal selected articles | GA-Class India articles | GA-Class India articles of High-importance | High-importance India articles | WikiProject India articles