Fundamental theorem of Galois theory
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
In mathematics, the fundamental theorem of Galois theory is a result that describes the structure of certain types of field extensions.
In its most basic form, the theorem asserts that given a field extension E/F which is finite and Galois, there is a one-to-one correspondence between its intermediate fields (fields K satisfying F ⊆ K ⊆ E; also called subextensions of E/F) and subgroups of its Galois group.
Contents |
[edit] Proof
The proof of the fundamental theorem is not trivial. The crux in the usual treatment is a rather delicate result of Emil Artin which allows one to control the dimension of the intermediate field fixed by a given group of automorphisms. See linear independence of automorphisms of a field.
There is also a fairly simple proof using the primitive element theorem. This proof seems to be ignored by most modern treatments, possibly because it requires a separate (but easier) proof in the case of finite fields. See [1]
In terms of its abstract structure, there is a Galois connection; most of its properties are fairly formal, but the actual isomorphism of the posets requires some work.
[edit] Explicit description of the correspondence
For finite extensions, the correspondence can be described explicitly as follows.
- For any subgroup H of Gal(E/F), the corresponding field, usually denoted EH, is the set of those elements of E which are fixed by every automorphism in H.
- For any intermediate field K of E/F, the corresponding subgroup is just Aut(E/K), that is, the set of those automorphisms in Gal(E/F) which fix every element of K.
For example, the topmost field E corresponds to the trivial subgroup of Gal(E/F), and the base field F corresponds to the whole group Gal(E/F).
[edit] Properties of the correspondence
The correspondence has the following useful properties.
- It is inclusion-reversing. The inclusion of subgroups H1 ⊆ H2 holds if and only if the inclusion of fields EH1 ⊇ EH2 holds.
- Degrees of extensions are related to orders of groups, in a manner consistent with the inclusion-reversing property. Specifically, if H is a subgroup of Gal(E/F), then |H| = [E:EH] and [Gal(E/F):H] = [EH:F].
- The field EH is a normal extension of F if and only if H is a normal subgroup of Gal(E/F). In this case, the restriction of the elements of Gal(E/F) to EH induces an isomorphism between Gal(EH/F) and the quotient group Gal(E/F)/H.
[edit] Example
Consider the field K = Q(√2, √3) = Q(√2)(√3). Since K is first determined by adjoining √2, then √3, a typical element of K can be written as:
where a, b, c, d are rational numbers. Its Galois group G = Gal (K/Q) can be determined by examining the automorphisms of K which fix a. Each such automorphism must send √2 to either √2 or −√2, and must send √3 to either √3 or −√3. Suppose that f exchanges √2 and −√2, so
and g exchanges √3 and −√3, so
These are clearly automorphisms of K. There is also the identity automorphism e which does not change anything, and the composition of f and g which changes the signs on both radicals:
Therefore
and G is isomorphic to the Klein four-group. It has five subgroups, each of which correspond via the theorem to a subfield of K.
- The trivial subgroup (containing only the identity element) corresponds to all of K.
- The entire group G corresponds to the base field Q.
- The two-element subgroup {1, f} corresponds to the subfield Q(√3), since f fixes √3.
- The two-element subgroup {1, g} corresponds to the subfield Q(√2), again since g fixes √2.
- The two-element subgroup {1, fg} corresponds to the subfield Q(√6), since fg fixes √6.
[edit] Example
The following is the simplest case where the Galois group is not abelian.
Consider the splitting field K of the polynomial x3−2 over Q; that is, K = Q (θ, ω), where θ is a cube root of 2, and ω is a cube root of 1 (but not 1 itself). For example, if we imagine K to be inside the field of complex numbers, we may take θ to be the real cube root of 2, and ω to be
It can be shown that the Galois group G = Gal (K/Q) has six elements, and is isomorphic to the group of permutations of three objects. It is generated by (for example) two automorphisms, say f and g, which are determined by their effect on θ and ω,
and then
The subgroups of G and corresponding subfields are as follows:
- As usual, the entire group G corresponds to the base field Q, and the trivial group {1} corresponds to the whole field K.
- There is a unique subgroup of order 3, namely {1, f, f2}. The corresponding subfield is Q(ω), which has degree two over Q (the minimal polynomial of ω is x2 + x + 1), corresponding to the fact that the subgroup has index two in G. Also, this subgroup is normal, corresponding to the fact that the subfield is normal over Q.
- There are three subgroups of order 2, namely {1, g}, {1, gf} and {1, gf2}, corresponding respectively to the three subfields Q(θ), Q(ωθ), Q(ω2θ). These subfields have degree three over Q, again corresponding to the subgroups having index 3 in G. Note that the subgroups are not normal in G, and this corresponds to the fact that the subfields are not Galois over Q. For example, Q(θ) contains only a single root of the polynomial x3−2, so it cannot be normal over Q.
[edit] Applications
The theorem converts the difficult-sounding problem of classifying the intermediate fields of E/F into the more tractable problem of listing the subgroups of a certain finite group.
For example, to prove that the general quintic equation is not solvable by radicals (see Abel-Ruffini theorem), one first restates the problem in terms of radical extensions (extensions of the form F(α) where α is an n-th root of some element of F), and then uses the fundamental theorem to convert this statement into a problem about groups. That can then be attacked directly.
Theories such as Kummer theory and class field theory are predicated on the fundamental theorem.
[edit] Infinite case
There is also a version of the fundamental theorem that applies to infinite algebraic extensions, which are normal and separable. It involves defining a certain topological structure, the Krull topology, on the Galois group; only subgroups that are also closed sets are relevant in the correspondence.
- ^ Marcus, Daniel: "Number Fields", Appendix 2. Springer-Verlag, 1977.