Talk:Fullback (American football)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] "Criticism of position"

Nice work creating this needed page, but I've never heard a coach, player, sports reporter, or even a fan (before now) express the opinion that a fullback--or any other position--is wasted roster space. Criticism must come from a cited published source. WP:Original research isn't allowed.--Son of Somebody 06:18, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

I'd have to agree that that whole sentence is contradictory. Fullbacks are runningbacks whose jobs come in the following order of importance: 1) Lead block 2) Pass block/catch passes 3) Run the ball. Unless they are a part of a wishbone, flexbone, or random option offense, there isn't really any reason to give them the ball unless on "trick plays." --Excaliburhorn 03:27, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

I have to wonder if, truly, there is pressure of the white tailback to bulk up and become a fullback. Sounds very anecdotal to me. Find a quote of somebody in the business, stating just that fact.

Given the Indianapolis Colts don't have a true FB (even with James Munro last season), they are listed as having no FB for the upcoming season. Will any of the 3 very undersized HB (Dorsey & the newly drafted HB) be converted to become FB? I mean, it is probably what could've happened in the Saints.TimHowardII 10:31, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Deleting the Criticism Section

I suggest we delete the criticism section. The section is uncited original research. It also appears to be a manufactured falsehood. I will await responses to my suggestion.--Son of Somebody 00:10, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

this article seems to have a negative approach to fullbacks being used primarily as blockers, good lead blocking by a fullbacks is an important part of an effiecent rushing offence —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.15.153.255 (talk) 18:36, August 24, 2007 (UTC)