Talk:Full on

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of the following WikiProjects:

WikiProject Music genres     (Rated Start-Class) Music Portal Full on is within the scope of WikiProject Music genres, a user driven attempt to clean up and standardise music genre articles on Wikipedia. Please visit the project guidelines page for ideas on how to structure a genre article and help us assess and improve genre articles to good and 1.0 standards. Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale. WikiProject Rave      (Rated Start-Class) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rave, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to Rave, Rave music and other various aspects of rave culture. For more information, visit our project page. Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale. WikiProject Electronic music      (Rated Start-Class) Electronic music Portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Electronic music, set up to organize and expand entries on Electronic music. Start This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Next to Astrix, who has a cross-over style, I don't believe full-on is anywhere close to uplifting trance. It is commercialized though, but still mainly underground which is why it does well. Some of the artists I am thinking of consist of The Misted Muppet, Sesto Sento, Vibe Tribe, Menog, etc. They have a solid background and track record IMO. --HotshotGG 4:24, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Full on is not equal to melodic psytrance, its soooo way wrong. Full on means: rolling bassline, dancefloor-friendly structure and of course has a tendency to be more acceptable to general public. There's japanese full on like Theoreme, which has almost nothing to do with melodies. On the other head, pure goa trance, like Filteria is hugely melodic, it's built on layers of melodies. I think we should remove this article altogether and write a new one, describing what the term Full On really refers to. Thanks :-) / ilyabirman

[edit] Article name

"Full on" is too non-specific. Even if correct, it should be Full on (music) or something. The proposed move is not uncontroversial. -- Beardo 00:22, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Yes, what do you want? Psychomelodic User:Psychomelodic/me 23:12, 16 February 2007 (UTC)