User talk:Fsol

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fsol, the ":::" is not for mainspace, it is for discussion pages. The text in articles is supposed to look like plain prose, not like something produced in a chatroom. Dahn (talk) 19:28, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

I actually tried to structure the info as coherently as I could. I already proposed some further restructuring, to reflect who said what and in what position (politicians, scholars, newspapers), but that would take some more looking into. As a side note: on wikipedia, the references always come after punctuation marks. Dahn (talk) 19:44, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Fsol: you are splitting prose attributing claims to their various authors into sections that deal with some obscure criterion (for example, you have split claims by Gallagher to which VT responded in such a manner as to lose their meaning, and leading the reader to believe that Gallagher continued to criticize Tismăneanu). I'm ready to address all your concerns, and have myself suggested a reshuffling of info into sections that should be created (Turgidson also has some insight on this). This is a thorny issue, since the claims are so dependent on outside context, and since they correspond to various chronologies of events. But please don't experiment with the text for the sake of experimenting. Dahn (talk) 20:38, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] King Michael's abdication

Hi, Fsol. Again, I thank you for pointing out that January 2007 article from the NYT. As I said I would, I did add some of that material in the article on Michael, which I think is the logical place to treat that issue in detail. As a matter of fact, I found a corroboration for the blackmail story -- a 2005 article from the Daily Telegraph. There is though a dispute there, on how to interpret some other sources, maybe you know more about these events and would like to weigh in. Turgidson (talk) 00:06, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

Sure thing -- here is the link you asked for. Turgidson (talk) 19:47, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
Thank you, Fsol, for your recent work on Michael I of Romania! It made the article (with a couple of exceptions - see my edits) much better. Lil' mouse (talk) 15:18, 15 December 2007 (UTC)