Talk:Frobenius algebra

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject Mathematics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, which collaborates on articles related to mathematics.
Mathematics rating: Start Class Low Priority  Field: Algebra

I expanded the article a bit and gave a good reference for history and algebraic study of Frobenius algebras. In particular, everything up to the categorical stuff is easily found in Lam (which has several sections on Frobenius algebras), and everything after is unsourced, but I remember some Baez article about this.

I did not actually include the duality theory which plays a prominent role in the study of Quasi-Frobenius rings and Iwanaga-Gorenstein rings. In particular, I did not include the classical contributions of Nakayama (because he has no wiki bio!) on the Nakayama permutation, the relations amongst the simple modules, and socle/head duality. Nor did I include Nakayama's term for these algebras, Frobeniusean, since he is the only one who used it more than once. Similarly, symmetric algebras received almost no special treatment, even though they are a fundamentally important special case. The generalizations to Frobenius rings, Quasi-Frobenius rings, and self-injective rings are not included here, but perhaps this would be a good place if quasi-frobenius does not get its own article. Lam would provide a good reference for the intuitive differences between these notions, but for generalizations of QF, one needs to look elsewhere (Faith's Rings and Things for instance has quite a few such generalizations). JackSchmidt (talk) 09:19, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Lam also acts as a source for the TQFT remarks, but has nothing on the categorical definition. I included a few other remarks too. JackSchmidt (talk) 09:55, 23 November 2007 (UTC)