User talk:Frithleeds
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hello, Frithleeds! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia.
Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Help
Tips
How to write a great article
Manual of Style
Fun stuff...
Be Bold
Assume Good faith
Keep cool
Have an experienced editor adopt you
Policy on neutral point of view
- And here are several pages on what to avoid
How to not spam
How to avoid copyright infringement
How to prevent violating the 3RR
What Wikipedia is not
Make sure not to get blocked, which should be no problem after reading this
If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking 
or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! Dekisugi (talk) 10:26, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] January 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Brixworth appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you. NeilN talk ♦ contribs 17:10, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Brixworth. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Brixworth was changed by Frithleeds (u) (t) replacing entire content with something else on 2008-01-28T18:07:01+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 18:07, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Brixworth, you will be blocked from editing. Dekisugi (talk) 09:49, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Matt smorfitt, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.
If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Doczilla (talk) 10:03, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of Holly cromie
A tag has been placed on Holly cromie, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Neverquick (talk) 14:13, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, such as Holly cromie, you will be blocked from editing. Dekisugi (talk) 14:14, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of Holly cromey
A tag has been placed on Holly cromey, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Neverquick (talk) 14:15, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page, as you did with Holly cromey, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Dekisugi (talk) 14:16, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] February 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Aston Villa F.C., did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Aston Villa F.C. was changed by Frithleeds (u) (t) replacing entire content with something else on 2008-02-02T23:31:02+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 23:31, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] March 2008
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Enigma msg! 09:32, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] May 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Iran, are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Roadrunnerz45 (talk 2 me) 09:42, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
Alex Bakharev (talk) 09:44, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
