User talk:Freedom Fighter 1988

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Welcome to Wikipedia!

Dear Freedom Fighter 1988: Welcome to Wikipedia, a free and open-content encyclopedia. I hope you enjoy contributing. To help get you settled in, I thought you might find the following pages useful:

Don't worry too much about being perfect. Very few of us are! Just in case you are not perfect, click here to see how you can avoid making common mistakes.

If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Wikipedians try to follow a strict policy of never biting new users. If you are unsure of how to do something, you are welcome to ask a more experienced user such as an administrator. One last bit of advice: please sign any dicussion comment with four tildes (~~~~). The software will automatically convert this into your signature which can be altered in the "Preferences" tab at the top of the screen. I hope I have not overwhelmed you with information. If you need any help just let me know. Once again welcome to Wikipedia, and don't forget to tell us about yourself and be BOLD!

Xiong Chiamiov
 :: contact ::

20:24, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Personal pronouns on Wikipedia

Oh, sorry. I should have clarified I was talking only about first and second person (singular/plural). You can't use these personal pronouns because an encyclopedia is an impersonal source. Wikipedia:Manual of Style itself states that "Wikipedia articles must not be based on one person's opinions or experiences", so "I can never be used except when it appears in a quotation", and the use of we and one must be avoided too, "for similar reasons".

The manual also says "it is sometimes appropriate to use we or one when referring to an experience that anyone, any reader, would be expected to have, such as general perceptual experiences." It said that a sentence such as "When most people open their eyes, they see something." can be written as "When we open our eyes, we see something." Open one's eyes is something truly general, therefore the use of we or one is acceptable.

The manual also talks about the second person (which must be avoided too), but you can read that on your own.Kazu-kun 18:01, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Principal Yakuza families

Hi there! Thanks a lot for your recent contribution to Wikipedia's article on Yakuza (section on Principal Families.)

I just wanted to let you know that the section really needs references and sources.

Also, I had to heavily copyedit and reword it. Please look the section over and make sure that I have not changed what you originally meant to say.

Thanks! --BloodDoll 02:18, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Jovian Federation

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Jovian Federation, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://homepage.mac.com/tatara/nadesicops/nd_j_jovianfed.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:03, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of United Confederation

A tag has been placed on United Confederation requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --Snigbrook (talk) 21:52, 17 February 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:CS ScreenShot.JPG

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:CS ScreenShot.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 04:54, 2 April 2008 (UTC)