User talk:FredClem
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Vik Puppy Love.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Vik Puppy Love.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 16:56, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
I thought I had represented a fair rationale of "Fair Use" as a part of the image when uploaded. It met with more than one citeria (as I saw it) in the "Faiir Use" rationale. The image as a whole itself was original (I created it). It's only outside contribution was a mirrored logo of the label name, used mainly as a graphic example for the text provided. That logo itself was purposely presented in a much lower resolution than originally published. It was not intended to compromise any copyright given RCA.
Please explain further why it was withdrawn. What is considered as being a "suitable explanation"? I really thought no more explanation was necessary. (Who is "I" who withdrew the image?)
Fred Clemens (FredClem)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Vik0197Samuels.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Vik0197Samuels.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 17:16, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
As with previous image, I felt the image used met with "fair use" rationale as described in Wikipedia guidelines. It was intentionally of lower resolution than the original publication, and was presented as a graphic example of how the RCA owned logo (Vik) was presented in it's original form. Any other presentaion I feel would have compromised what was intended. How can you justify allowing an album cover image if you can't use the same justification in using a label image?
Wikipedia often requires "citation needed" in order to validate certain information. Many times I see information sources being as inaccurate, or that inaccurate information as being exaggerated at best. What better source is there than to go with the actual unmodified artifact? I have made corrections to certain pages based on specific artifacts (physical evidence), or what was learned from the person, himself (as was by Jerry Samuels), not what was represented by others in a book or article, ).
Fred Clemens (FredClem)
[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Vik Puppy Love.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Vik Puppy Love.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 20:39, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Vik0197Samuels.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Vik0197Samuels.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 20:39, 6 March 2008 (UTC)