Talk:Freedom Party of Ontario
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada and related WikiProjects, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles on Canada-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project member page, to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. |
| Low | This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. |
 |
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Political parties, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of political parties-related topics. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to "featured" and "good article" standards, or visit the WikiProject page for more details. [View this template] |
| Portal | |
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale. |
| Low | This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. |
 |
Discussions on this page may escalate into heated debate. Please try to keep a cool head when commenting here. See also: Wikipedia:Etiquette. |
 Archives |
|---|
[edit] Merge
Since no one's said anything one way or another about the proposed merge from Unparty, I went ahead and brought that section here, under History:1980-1984. STGM 21:37, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] False information?
It isnt defamatory if its true. Homey 16:24, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
- I have to agree with Homey on this. If it's verified and cited, then leave it be. Ardenn 00:52, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
- Wikipedia is not a sopabox or propaganda machine. We report accurate information, not just what you want others to see. Ardenn 00:54, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
For my part, I'm not entirely certain what the anon is complaining about. CJCurrie 01:49, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
- I think he's complaining that there's info unflattering to his party in there, and he's trying to say it's not attributed to them. Ardenn 01:59, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
I left a note on the anon user's talk page about making legal threats. Ardenn 23:14, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] From the archives
The reintroduction of the removed text seems to have been done very well. Thanks so much for this work, CJCurrie. I removed a small section that didn't seem to relate well to the title, but left all the rest as is. We'll see what the reaction to this change is, and if we get any more mail. But I think that this has done just what's needed - added well sourced information back in a careful and non-biased way. -- sannse (talk) 20:47, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
Sannse was referring to my revised version of the text, which is essentially the same the current version (expect for the missing Paul Blair reference). Are there any further updates? CJCurrie 00:03, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
- I still don't see the relevance of much of the "Freedom of Speech issues" section, but I'm on holiday soon so I won't remove it again. Physchim62 (talk) 08:30, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
