Talk:Frederick Stocken

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Frederick Stocken is part of WikiProject PipeOrgan, which aims to develop and expand Wikipedia's content relating to the pipe organ and its associated repertoire, organists, and other articles.
If you would like to participate, you can edit Frederick Stocken, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed biographical guide to musicians and musical groups on Wikipedia.
This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Biography because it uses a stub template.
  • If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page.
  • If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WPBiography}} template, removing {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.
Articles for deletion This article was nominated for deletion on April 20, 2007. The result of the discussion was keep.

[edit] Hecklers?

Some mention is needed here of Stocken's anti-modernist activities, including organising a group called The Hecklers to boo Birtwistle's Gawain and writing an article for the New Statesman likening Boulez to Marx (or, I suppose, Lenin -- the whole thing seems ot be a complete nonsense to me, but there it is).

-- Ornette

[edit] Vanity Page?

Is this a vanity page? I think it should be marked for deletion. The only notable thing this person has done is to boo an established and well respected composer.

Seneca_2007 18:49, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

This page has existed for about two years and now someone decides that it should be deleted. Regardless of whether you agree with Stocken's anti modernist stance, the assertion that is done nothing else of note is absurd and patently untrue