Talk:Fred the Undercover Kitty

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Cats Portal This article is supported by WikiProject Cats. This project provides a central approach to Cat-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)

[edit] Cats should be kept indoors

This article is just further proof of why cats should be kept indoors. Dionyseus 20:23, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

That is what you think. I don't disagree, but it's still a viewpoint and Wikipedia is not a soapbox. Haakon 20:43, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

No, it is what is suggested by vets and anyone who loves cats nationwide. Dionyseus 20:44, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Believe me, I love cats too. But I would still feel bad about denying a cat the joys of exploring his instincts outside. In a busy city, it may indeed be wise to keep cats indoors at all time. But some live in places where there is far less danger of such accidents. You may think that cats should be kept indoors no matter what, but though held by many, it is still just a viewpoint. It should be attributed as such. Haakon 20:49, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

I love my cat a whole lot. She's gone outside since she was big enough to... go outside. She's creeping up on fifteen and she has never been hit by a car. True, her sister got hit by a car, and the young tom we got afterwards "disappeared", but... If anything, it's proof that humans don't belong driving around in a cat's habitat.

Turns out he was an indoor cat that escaped his home. I'll see if I can add a mention of this into the article. Dionyseus 02:42, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

As I perused this webpage today I felt the need to make a few friendly comments/discussion points. It seems to me that those few people that feel the need to edit this page are forgetting the most important aspect of "Fred the undercover kitty". Fred was a cat!! Please remember that domestic shorthair is a fancy name for 'alley cat' or 'mutt'. Let us also not forget that Fred was lucky enough to have found a great owner that loved him dearly, but Fred did not apprehend the fugitives, it was the humans surrounding Fred that carried out the arrests. It seems a little far-fetched to anthropomorphosize (sp?) this cat. Otherwise, this seems like a very sweet memorial to a cat by a loving owner, nothing more. It should be left as just that. Just my opinions, feel free to have your own opinion. It is as we say a free world. I also believe that cats should be kept indoors, unless you are lucky enough to live in the seclusion of the country. CatLoverInNebraska 16:32, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

I think it's pretty clear that enlisted by the Brooklyn District Attorney’s office is being said figuratively. If the City of New York gives Fred an award, I think Wikipedia can lighten up a little and go along with the story. Peter Grey 00:01, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Minor Changes

I made some minor changes for clarity. the article contained the bizarre phrase "posing as a fake Veternarian" twice. WHAT??? Posing as a fake anything is not a crime. Posing as a REAL vet is a crime. I edited the article accordingly.Lisapollison 02:26, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:FredUndercoverKitty.jpg

Image:FredUndercoverKitty.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:53, 4 June 2007 (UTC)