Talk:Fred T. Goldberg, Jr.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Libelous
The section on scientology, mentioning uncited rumors, it certainly bordering on libel.
Either substantiate the claims or remove them. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 151.203.18.206 (talk • contribs).
- Reputable sourced citations are already included in that subsection, however more will be provided. The sentences are already tagged with {{fact}} Smee 06:33, 4 June 2007 (UTC).
-
- No unsourced sentence in a biography of a living person should begin with the phrase "There is a rumor..." Do you understand the policy on Wikipedia:libel? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 151.203.18.206 (talk • contribs).
[edit] Article needs expansion
- This article needs expansion. The whole Scientology controversy was reported on by multiple reputable secondary sources. I will try to expand the article, and add some (10) or so additional citations about this incident. Smee 07:14, 4 June 2007 (UTC).
- I have a little list. [1][2] AndroidCat (talk) 06:56, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Notable?
This article mainly seems to exist for the purpose of complaining about the IRS/CoS settlement. There is nothing very notable about Mr. Goldberg mentioned except for rumors about his possible involvement with that. Steve Dufour 00:31, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
- I decided to take out the whole section as well as the Project Scientology tag on this page because of BLP problems mentioned above. Steve Dufour 10:42, 4 October 2007 (UTC)