User talk:Frank Zamjatin

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Ragisma and Breedsma

I agree that these terms needed to be cited. But flagging them with {{fact}} tags on List of musical intervals is not the proper way to request that in this case. If a term is a link to an article explaining the term, the fact tag is inappropriate. If those articles are unsourced, as they are in this case, those articles should be flagged as containing unsourced claims (with {{unreferenced}}). — Gwalla | Talk 18:31, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, I wasn't aware of that. "Ragisma" is sourced, found in a linked article (I consider the source dubious but whatever). So I'll leave it alone. But what do I do if a term has no article, isn't {{fact}} correct in that case? Frank Zamjatin (talk) 21:58, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Yes, if there's no article, the term isn't explained in the article in which it appears, and you can't provide a citation yourself, {{fact}} is correct. — Gwalla | Talk 15:57, 18 April 2008 (UTC)