User talk:Frank Pais
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Please do not remove sourced information about Shane Ruttle Martinez. Information that is linked to a valid source, should not be removed. The concept that you are applying, BLP, applies to unsourced negative information, not sourced negative information. ⇒ SWATJester Denny Crane. 04:46, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Shane Ruttle Martinez
I have this article on my watch list. I'll keep an eye on it. AnnieHall 18:46, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] You should apologize
Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Calling a fellow editor a neo-Nazi is unacceptable behaviour. If you are a decent person, you will apologize. CWC 08:28, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Help Support my Edit
On including Dimitrov and Mariategui on the Communism sector, Like Rosa luxemburg and trotsky and idiots so if those two idiots can be included. These two sure as hell deserve recognition. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template_talk:Communism#If_Trotsky_and_Rosa_Luxenburg_are_included_then_so_should_Georgi_Dimitrov_and_Jose_Carlos_Mariategui
--CmrdMariategui 02:04, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] RE: Talk page guidelines
Hello, I'm just here to let you know that you seem to have misinterpreted what talk pages are for. In this edit, you removed an anonomous comment, saying it was biased. The comment was not an obvious personal attack, and removing other people's comments, even "unfounded" ones (you can make comments without references on talk pages, it's why they're there) is poor etiquette. Also, I've seen the video myself, and, knowing something about the integrity of Canadian broadcasting organizations, and this video in particular, can even inform you that the anonomous poster whose comment you removed was actually -correct-. In future, try to be more careful. Talk pages are for discussion, removing other people's comments except in the case of grievous personal attacks tends to be a bad idea. I've replaced the comment, cheers. Raeft 12:33, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
- Your analogy on my talk page was part of what's called "Reductio ad absurdium". Martinez isn't identified in the video, but he IS associated with groups identified. Also, the Toronto Sun article, which I'm in the process of making available, clears the matter up, so it's a non issue. Now, to finish: WP:TALK only allows one to remove true libel. Saying someone was arrested is not libel if, it turns out, it's true. In this case, as someone looking at the evidence in my hands, it's true he was arrested but not convicted. The person has the right to contribute, and the video IS on Google Videos. The comment's not yours, seriously, you shouldn't refactor it. Raeft 11:49, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Paul Fromm (politician)
Since you moved Paul Fromm to Paul Fromm (politician) (via "neo-Nazi"), there are now many articles that point to the wrong article. Could you follow through and fix the links? ·:· Will Beback ·:· 05:24, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] AfD tag on Shane Ruttle Martinez
I understand your frustration however the Articles for deletion procedure was followed properly and you must not remove AfD notices. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment on the AfD page. Dbromage [Talk] 01:30, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Western Canada For Us
If you're around, I could use your input on this, as it has been nominated for deletion. AnnieHall 05:03, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Tri-City Skins and the Canadian Ethnic Cleansing Team Nominated for Deletion
I've know that you have an interest in the Canadian far right. Perhaps you would want to provide your input on whether these two articles should be kept as they are, modified, or deleted as per the nomination? AnnieHall 05:35, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] More busy work by the fascists
Hey Frank, "Cheap Laffs" is up to his usually tricks. I came across this today:
Please sound off on it when you get a chance, and counter the crap being spewed. Thanks! UnionPride 20:18, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Shane Ruttle Martinez
Done and done. It's actually been on my watch list for a while but others are a lot quicker than I am when it comes to reverting the vandalism that has been occuring. Still, my good eye is watching. The bad one is looking at shirtless Brad Pitt photos though. AnnieHall 01:12, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
- Well I did say it was my bad eye. It's bad for a reason you knw. ;-) AnnieHall 05:23, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
- I restored my improvements to the layout and section titles in that article; this time with clear explanations for each individual change.Spylab 14:42, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2007/Vote/Thebainer
Good morning. I have indented your vote on Thebainer's voting page in the Arbitration Committee Election. In order to vote, editors must have 150 mainspace edits as of 1 November 2007. Accordingly, your vote is removed from the count - though, I note that it remains on record as a statement of your position. Please feel free to post any questions you may have at my talk page, or at the talk page for the election. Thank you for your interest in participating in this year's election. Best, ZZ Claims ~ Evidence 06:18, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Meir Weinstein
Please do not post copy and pasted articles onto Meir Weinstein. If you would like to add that information you need to rewrite it and not use potentially POV sources.
-
- --Eternalsleeper (talk) 20:14, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Can you please review the debate at Talk:Meir_Weinstein#my_opinion? Thanks. Black as pitch (talk) 18:39, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] April 2008
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to User:Veritas-Canada. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Geniac (talk) 15:42, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
