User talk:FrankTobia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archives

/Archive 0

Contents 1 Frank I hate you 2 RPI Wiki Party 3 Adam Smith has been chosen as the first article in WikiProject Economics' first Featured Article drive 4 Mount King William 5 Hauser's Law 6 Look forward to working with you re: Adam Smith 7 Frequenty viewed economics articles 8 Utility

[edit] Frank I hate you

First of all, we can't edit Wikipedia from work which is where we do our racing. Second of all, to delete the article would be to shoot the sun out of the sky with an illegal weapon and cover my world in darkness. Lauren thinks you're lame. She's crying. She just wanted to be famous. Nobody links to Lauren's page so its not like we're spamming Wikipedia and creating false links. It's something for me and my two roommates to share. I HATE YOU FRANK. Teddyrbear (talk) 21:16, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] RPI Wiki Party

Unfortunately, I can't go; I've got a geometry take-home exam to work on. I appreciate you inviting me, though. Quicksilvre (talk) 22:14, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

I couldn't make it either, but would love to collaborate on the RPI article, or whatever else came out of the event. --Zr2d2 (talk) 05:56, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

So sorry I couldn't make it; I've been away from Wikipedia for a while. OneScholar (talk) 19:02, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the invite, but (a) I didn't see it in time, (b) I haven't been a student since 1986, (c) I live several hundred miles away and (d) wouldn't see the point of coming since I wouldn't know anybody anyway. --Rpresser 03:21, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Adam Smith has been chosen as the first article in WikiProject Economics' first Featured Article drive

I am contacting you because you Supported the decision to choose Adam Smith as the first Featured Article that WikiProject Economics would work on. If you can, please help out and make this goal a reality! A discussion on this has begun at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Economics#The Featured Article drive is now closed. Thanks for your time! Gary King (talk) 16:46, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Mount King William

The NLA external link is sufficient to show it exists - therefore it is in the furthest stretch a ref/cite - however point taken SatuSuro 14:28, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

No worries I am avery anti oggle individual - I have sufficient refs to crowd it - thanks for your work though - its reassuring to see that new changes picks up things - Id rather get challenged by one of you guys than watch my watchlist fill up with vndlsms from 12 hours ago that no one has picked up :( (which happens regularly for m,y weird watchlist) - cheers - SatuSuro 14:41, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks again for your help and the redirect too - cheers SatuSuro 14:48, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Hauser's Law

Reply on my talk, regards – Zedla (talk) 19:55, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Look forward to working with you re: Adam Smith

I've never had anyone accept that I had good faith during a revert before. I add well cited information and always have a confrontation I don't want. I appreciate your willingness to consider the intentions of the author, and take it to the talk page where it can be discussed. Thanks. q (talk) 22:24, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Frequenty viewed economics articles

This is a reply to a question you asked on the mathematics project talk page about Wikipedia:WikiProject Mathematics/Wikipedia 1.0/Frequently viewed/List. I created that list based on article viewing statistics that have been released by the server admins. One interface to these is the site http://stats.grok.se. I used a list of all mathematics articles, together with that data, to make the list of frequently viewed math articles, and I plan to update it occasionally (every few months, if I remember). I don't mind setting up the same thing for economics. Unless you have a list of all economics articles somewhere, I will use the list of economics articles that are listed in the WP 1.0 assessment tables. — Carl (CBM · talk) 02:46, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Utility

I'm writing here in response to your question about a book covering utility theory. I've always liked Varian's Micro Theory texts - you can pick whichever seems to be at the best level for you. For something a little more challenging, there's Riubinsteins Lecture notes in Microeconomic Theory: The Economic Agent. For a historical look, the article on Utility in the New Palgrave is good. Best, JohnJQ (talk) 05:18, 7 June 2008 (UTC)