User talk:Frank.trampe

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] License tagging for Image:River Roads Mall Concept Drawing 1.png

Thanks for uploading Image:River Roads Mall Concept Drawing 1.png. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:09, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Frank, I do not think the section of the article where you use it is encyclopedic content. I agree we should have articles of abandoned malls, but I do not see how a description of the details of the structure helps. I intend to delete the image, and remove that paragraph--please comment on the article talk page. DGG (talk) 05:12, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image source problem with Image:River Roads Mall Concept Drawing 1.png

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:River Roads Mall Concept Drawing 1.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:39, 15 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer(Broken clamshellsOtter chirps) 22:39, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:River Roads Logo 5 Bad.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:River Roads Logo 5 Bad.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer(Broken clamshellsOtter chirps) 17:34, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:River Roads Mall Concept Drawing 1.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:River Roads Mall Concept Drawing 1.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:20, 20 October 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:River Roads Logo 5 Bad.png

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:River Roads Logo 5 Bad.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 05:53, 14 February 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:StixB1.3.svg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:StixB1.3.svg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 06:00, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:River Roads Logo 5 Bad.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:River Roads Logo 5 Bad.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 19:47, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:StixB1.3.svg)

Thanks for uploading Image:StixB1.3.svg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 19:50, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:River Roads Logo 5 Bad.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:River Roads Logo 5 Bad.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 04:02, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Patrick Coughlin

A tag has been placed on Patrick Coughlin, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because while the subject may merit inclusion in Wikipedia, the page lacks insufficient content to evaluate one way or another. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Pen of bushido (talk) 08:15, 2 March 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Trans World Airlines Globe Map Logo 1.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Trans World Airlines Globe Map Logo 1.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 04:17, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Harvard Seal 1.svg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Harvard Seal 1.svg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:22, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Possibly unfree Image:River Roads Logo Crisp 1.png

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:River Roads Logo Crisp 1.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters(Broken clamshellsOtter chirps) 03:11, 1 May 2008 (UTC) --Ten Pound Hammer and his otters(Broken clamshellsOtter chirps) 03:11, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Problem with Image:Harvard_Seal_1.svg

I think Harvard's logo should reflect the version currently used by official Harvard University communications such as on their website. According to this criteria, Harvard's proper logo should be the plain Veritas shield or the Veritas shield surrounded by a wreath. Also, logos should never be unofficially reproduced.

From the Wikipedia logos page:

Reasonable diligence should be taken to ensure that the logo is accurate and has a high-quality appearance. Common sense says that a logo displayed prominently on the logo owner's own website should be OK to use, because it represents their wishes about how the logo is presented on computer screens at typical screen resolutions. Avoid resizing a logo—try to find one that is a suitable size. Do not use a resized logo if it doesn't look good.

From Harvard's Trademark Program page:

1. Each Harvard department, unit or student group should use the designated shield representing its affiliation with the University. For example, a Harvard College student group can use the Harvard College shield as seen on the http://www.college.harvard.edu/ home page. 2. If a new logo is to be produced, a designated shield may be incorporated into the new design (the shield may not be altered or manipulated in any way but a design may be place around the designated shield). For example, the Harvard Native American Program has created such a logo. See: http://www.ksg.harvard.edu/hunap. ... If options 2 or 3 are chosen, the new logo/design will need to be reviewed by the Trademark Program.


Please also see what I wrote in the Harvard discussion page:

The version of the logo currently shown on the Harvard University wikipedia page is obsolete and is no longer in use in any prominent official instances on Harvard's website. [1] The proper Harvard logo should be, as discussed in item 15 above, either the Veritas shield on its own, or the Veritas shield with the wreath. In addition, the user who uploaded the file (user talk:Frank.trampe) failed to attribute a proper source for the logo, but he seems to imply that he created the seal by himself. The file also lacks a logo tag and proper fair use tag. I will be removing this seal and reverting it back to the original Veritas shield. Atheros07 (talk) 17:53, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Atheros07 (talk) 18:13, 4 May 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Image deletion?

Interesting that you repeat "entrust the deletion of my images to me" /"I am perfectly capable of deleting images that I think need to be deleted" when you are not a sysop and don't have the ability to actually delete an image. Am I missing something here?

In Re Image:River Roads Logo Crisp 1.png, the issue was brought up on the IFD page regarding an attribution one way or another of the actual (c) holder, which was not resolved. Claims of "I was granted...", as you know, are verified by the OTRS process. The assumption on logos is that they are not free, unless proven otherwise. And, it is the responsibility of the uploader to provide the proofs, if questioned. Since such proofs have not been given, the question still remains if the image is (c) or not. Given the mall was in existence until 1997, the (c) would continue the normal 20 years (doubtful that anyone had renewed it, as you point out) and would not be PD until 2017. SkierRMH (talk) 06:46, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagger bot

I believe the one that you may be refering to (not 100% sure) is Betacommandbot, which is currently under much discussion & review right now most recent. If you catch it again, the best place to make note of this would be here. I think it's a fair catch, however, as so many claims of "I was given permission..." (regardless of the actual template/license tag) are spurious, and it's probably a good thing to have these claims either expunged from the page or investigated further. SkierRMH (talk) 17:40, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] all copyrighted logos, etc

Sorry about the double post... your second question - malls are not excluded or singled out in any way. All (c) logos should be tagged with {{non-free logo}} and a "Fair Use Rationale" added. No "permission" is necessary for the "fair use" of any (c) materials, provided, of course, that they do fall under the criteria of fair use. When these are incorrectly tagged, such as "self" or "creative commons" or the like, the claim of the tag is incorrect & could get Wiki into legal trouble - which is why they're removed with such vehemence. SkierRMH (talk) 17:43, 28 May 2008 (UTC)