Talk:Frauds, Myths, and Mysteries: Science and Pseudoscience in Archaeology
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate, you can edit the article. You can discuss the Project at its talk page. |
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at in the comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
 |
This article is being improved by WikiProject Rational Skepticism. Wikiproject Rational Skepticism seeks to improve the quality of articles dealing with science, pseudosciences, pseudohistory and skepticism. Please feel free to help us improve this page. | |
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
|
[edit] Please delete this
This article is purely promotional and has no real justification otherwise.
[edit] Please Do Not Delete
- How does a comment get here with no signature? The book is widely used in archaeology courses, that's enough to justify its inclusion.--Dougweller (talk) 19:00, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
This book is important as an internal link to verify archaeologic frauds. It should be kept. Pustelnik (talk) 12:13, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
-
- I've now found out how to see who added a comment. The only other edit the person made who asked this to be deleted was to put a very rightwing POV on an article, so I'm assuming some such motivation was behind his/her request for deletion.Doug Weller (talk) 12:45, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
