Talk:Franklin Rosemont
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
There is no reason to merge other pages with this. As far as I can determine, the only reason to merge any pages would be to prove some kind of point that Franklin Rosemont was the only significant participant in subjects of merged articles, but there hardly exists any evidence to support this. This is why I identified the merges as vandalism. --Daniel C. Boyer 13:43, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
- All right, I'll try to work with you on this.
- Please see Wikipedia:Vandalism for a discussion of what is and is not vandalism.
- The purpose of the merge was to create an article with sufficient content, and to eliminate duplication. Prior to the merge, there was considerable duplication of content among these articles, and each of them was too short to stand on its own.
- Rosemont would appear to be the major figure in the two organizations whose articles were redirected here, and I made every effort to retain the content of those articles.
The Uninvited Co., Inc. 17:29, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
- Where you are getting this "appearance" from I don't know, but the major participation of Penelope Rosemont, Paul Garon et al. makes me wonder why you are saying this. --Daniel C. Boyer 18:43, 12 August 2005 (UTC)
Daniel, do you have a really good picture of Franklin Rosemont? I want to see it.Classicjupiter2 00:45, 12 August 2005 (UTC)
Categories: Biography articles without listas parameter | Biography articles of living people | Arts and entertainment work group articles | Stub-Class biography (arts and entertainment) articles | Unknown-priority biography (arts and entertainment) articles | Stub-Class biography articles | Automatically assessed biography articles | Automatically assessed biography (arts and entertainment) articles