Talk:Frank Vandenbroucke (cyclist)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
B	This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
	This article is supported by the Sports and games work group.

This page relates to the WikiProject Belgium, a project to create and improve Belgium-related Wikipedia articles. If you would like to participate, you can join the project, and help with our open tasks.

	Cycling Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cycling. WikiProject Cycling is an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to cycling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the discussion.
B	This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.

Francisco del Ponte" (an Italianized version of his name) That's incorrect. The name is Francesco del Ponte but the italianized version of his name of VDB would be Francesco del Pantalone—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 87.5.79.104 (talk) 12:32, October 10, 2006

I've modified the "del Ponte" comment. You should remember to sign your posts though. --Armchair ninja 13:47, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

That is an utter lie. Del Ponte is the correct italianisation. Leptictidium (mammal talk!) 23:16, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Sources

I have removed a source from cycling4all.com as per WP:RS. cycling4all is an interesting website to read and it is clear the editor/writer puts in a lot of time. However, as there is no editorial oversight and is itself a collection of news, doesn't really qualify as a reliable source. Moreover, if a source is noted there, then it will have been noted by a reliable news source first elsewhere. --Mk3severo 22:39, 21 February 2007 (UTC)